Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move TreeMap, TreeAccumulator and TreeTraverser into Reflection #10184

Merged

Conversation

nicolasstucki
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki self-assigned this Nov 5, 2020
@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki force-pushed the move-tree-map-to-refelction branch from 83638bc to 38973e2 Compare November 5, 2020 16:02
@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki marked this pull request as ready for review November 5, 2020 16:11
Copy link
Contributor

@liufengyun liufengyun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

trait TreeAccumulator[X] extends reflect.TreeAccumulator[X] {
val reflect: reflection.type = reflection
}
/** TASTy Reflect tree accumulator.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I remember one of the previous PRs is to avoid the name TASTy.

Suggested change
/** TASTy Reflect tree accumulator.
/** Tree accumulator.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll do a general cleanup of the docs in a separate PR

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki merged commit c20be38 into scala:master Nov 5, 2020
@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki deleted the move-tree-map-to-refelction branch November 5, 2020 20:26
@Kordyjan Kordyjan added this to the 3.0.0 milestone Aug 2, 2023
odersky added a commit to dotty-staging/dotty that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
Fixes scala#10184

The overlooked case was an AppliedType where we don't dealias correctly (i.e.
at phase at most erasure).
WojciechMazur pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2024
Fixes #10184

The overlooked case was an AppliedType where we don't dealias correctly (i.e.
at phase at most erasure).

[Cherry-picked 6841c75]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants