Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

snyk-updates #2173

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2024
Merged

snyk-updates #2173

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2024

Conversation

jasquat
Copy link
Contributor

@jasquat jasquat commented Dec 3, 2024

Ignore new snyk issues until we can upgrade werkzeug and connexion.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Updated expiration date for an existing vulnerability ignore entry to extend protection.
    • Added new entries for Werkzeug-related vulnerabilities to enhance security management.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 3, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the Snyk policy file in the spiffworkflow-backend project. An existing vulnerability ignore entry related to Werkzeug has had its expiration date extended by one year. Additionally, two new vulnerability ignore entries for Werkzeug have been added, both with the same expiration date and reason for ignoring as the existing entry. No alterations were made to the patch or exclude sections of the file.

Changes

File Change Summary
spiffworkflow-backend/.snyk Updated expiration date for SNYK-PYTHON-WERKZEUG-6808933 from 2024-11-01 to 2025-11-01. Added new entries for SNYK-PYTHON-WERKZEUG-8309091 and SNYK-PYTHON-WERKZEUG-8309092, both with expiration 2025-11-01.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant SnykPolicy

    User->>SnykPolicy: Request to update vulnerability ignores
    SnykPolicy->>SnykPolicy: Update expiration for existing entry
    SnykPolicy->>SnykPolicy: Add new vulnerability ignore entries
    SnykPolicy-->>User: Policy updated successfully
Loading

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a3c5219 and 96a1d16.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • spiffworkflow-backend/.snyk (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
spiffworkflow-backend/.snyk (3)

34-45: Verify the tracking of Werkzeug upgrade blockers

The changes extend existing vulnerability ignores and add new ones for Werkzeug, all with an expiration of November 2025. While the comment references issue #592 for tracking the upgrade blocker, we should ensure this technical debt is being actively managed.

Let's verify the status of the tracking issue and related dependencies:

Consider the following recommendations:

  1. Set a reminder to revisit this before the November 2025 expiration
  2. Investigate if we can use connexion alternatives that support newer Werkzeug versions
  3. Document any attempted upgrades or workarounds in the referenced issue
✅ Verification successful

Technical debt for Werkzeug upgrade is properly tracked and documented

The vulnerability exceptions are justified based on the following findings:

  • Issue upgrade werkzeug and connexion from version 2 to 3 #592 is open and actively tracking the Werkzeug upgrade blocker
  • The backend's pyproject.toml confirms the dependency constraints:
    • Werkzeug is pinned to "^2.3" due to Connexion compatibility
    • Connexion v2 is required with swagger-ui extras
  • The issue documents that Connexion v3 (which would support newer Werkzeug) is still in alpha
  • A clear upgrade path is identified: wait for Connexion v3 to stabilize

The current approach of extending the vulnerability exceptions to November 2025 is reasonable given the documented technical constraints and active tracking.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the status of the Werkzeug upgrade blocker issue and related dependencies

# Check if the referenced issue exists and is still open
gh issue view 592 --repo sartography/spiff-arena

# Check current Werkzeug version constraints in requirements
rg -A 1 "werkzeug" requirements*.txt || echo "No direct Werkzeug requirement found"

# Check connexion version constraints which affect Werkzeug
rg -A 1 "connexion" requirements*.txt || echo "No direct connexion requirement found"

Length of output: 1628


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual requirements files with the correct path
fd requirements.txt --exec cat {} \; 2>/dev/null

# Also check setup.py or pyproject.toml for dependencies
fd "setup.py|pyproject.toml" --exec cat {} \; 2>/dev/null

Length of output: 12673


36-40: Verify severity of SNYK-PYTHON-WERKZEUG-8309091

Let's ensure we understand the risk we're accepting by ignoring this vulnerability.


41-45: Verify severity of SNYK-PYTHON-WERKZEUG-8309092

Let's ensure we understand the risk we're accepting by ignoring this vulnerability as well.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jasquat jasquat merged commit bdb010f into main Dec 3, 2024
21 checks passed
@jasquat jasquat deleted the snyk-updates branch December 3, 2024 16:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant