-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
snyk-updates #2173
snyk-updates #2173
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to the Snyk policy file in the spiffworkflow-backend project. An existing vulnerability ignore entry related to Werkzeug has had its expiration date extended by one year. Additionally, two new vulnerability ignore entries for Werkzeug have been added, both with the same expiration date and reason for ignoring as the existing entry. No alterations were made to the patch or exclude sections of the file. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant SnykPolicy
User->>SnykPolicy: Request to update vulnerability ignores
SnykPolicy->>SnykPolicy: Update expiration for existing entry
SnykPolicy->>SnykPolicy: Add new vulnerability ignore entries
SnykPolicy-->>User: Policy updated successfully
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (3)spiffworkflow-backend/.snyk (3)
The changes extend existing vulnerability ignores and add new ones for Werkzeug, all with an expiration of November 2025. While the comment references issue #592 for tracking the upgrade blocker, we should ensure this technical debt is being actively managed. Let's verify the status of the tracking issue and related dependencies: Consider the following recommendations:
✅ Verification successfulTechnical debt for Werkzeug upgrade is properly tracked and documented The vulnerability exceptions are justified based on the following findings:
The current approach of extending the vulnerability exceptions to November 2025 is reasonable given the documented technical constraints and active tracking. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the status of the Werkzeug upgrade blocker issue and related dependencies
# Check if the referenced issue exists and is still open
gh issue view 592 --repo sartography/spiff-arena
# Check current Werkzeug version constraints in requirements
rg -A 1 "werkzeug" requirements*.txt || echo "No direct Werkzeug requirement found"
# Check connexion version constraints which affect Werkzeug
rg -A 1 "connexion" requirements*.txt || echo "No direct connexion requirement found"
Length of output: 1628 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual requirements files with the correct path
fd requirements.txt --exec cat {} \; 2>/dev/null
# Also check setup.py or pyproject.toml for dependencies
fd "setup.py|pyproject.toml" --exec cat {} \; 2>/dev/null
Length of output: 12673
Let's ensure we understand the risk we're accepting by ignoring this vulnerability.
Let's ensure we understand the risk we're accepting by ignoring this vulnerability as well. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Ignore new snyk issues until we can upgrade werkzeug and connexion.
Summary by CodeRabbit