Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency groq-js to ^1.16.0 #8856

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: next
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 6, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
groq-js ^1.15.0 -> ^1.16.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

sanity-io/groq-js (groq-js)

v1.16.0

Compare Source

Features
  • functions: add releases:all() (7c67bd1)
Bug Fixes
  • functions: correct behaviour of partOfRelease and versionOf (1a85198)
  • revert sanity::versionsOf to versionOf (#​274) (6179e61)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by Sanity. View repository job log here

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner March 6, 2025 16:28
@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner March 6, 2025 16:28
@renovate renovate bot requested review from jordanl17 and removed request for a team March 6, 2025 16:28
@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (squash) March 6, 2025 16:28
Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 6, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Mar 6, 2025 6:35pm
performance-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Mar 6, 2025 6:35pm
test-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Mar 6, 2025 6:35pm
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Mar 6, 2025 6:35pm
test-next-studio ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Mar 6, 2025 6:35pm

Copy link

socket-security bot commented Mar 6, 2025

Updated dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
npm/[email protected]1.16.0 None 0 0 B

View full report↗︎

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 6, 2025

No changes to documentation

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 6, 2025

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 42.03% 54352 / 129299
🔵 Statements 42.03% 54352 / 129299
🔵 Functions 46.93% 2729 / 5815
🔵 Branches 79.42% 10186 / 12825
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #31843 for commit c3d9f2a by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 6, 2025

Component Testing Report Updated Mar 6, 2025 6:40 PM (UTC)

❌ Failed Tests (1) -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 3s 15 0 0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 12s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 1m 16s 5 0 1
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 47s 11 7 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 24s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 14s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 27s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 6s 15 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 29s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 46s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 12s 3 9 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 36s 21 0 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 6, 2025

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Thu, 06 Mar 2025 18:48:08 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 19.6 efps (51ms) 22.2 efps (45ms) -6ms (-11.8%)
article (body) 67.6 efps (15ms) 67.6 efps (15ms) +0ms (-/-%)
article (string inside object) 19.6 efps (51ms) 23.8 efps (42ms) -9ms (-17.6%)
article (string inside array) 18.3 efps (55ms) 20.8 efps (48ms) -7ms (-11.9%)
synthetic (title) 16.9 efps (59ms) 18.2 efps (55ms) -4ms (-6.8%)
synthetic (string inside object) 15.6 efps (64ms) 19.0 efps (53ms) -12ms (-18.0%)

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 51ms 59ms 93ms 334ms 1581ms 12.2s
article (body) 15ms 17ms 21ms 145ms 208ms 5.8s
article (string inside object) 51ms 54ms 59ms 222ms 1070ms 9.0s
article (string inside array) 55ms 57ms 62ms 157ms 1061ms 8.5s
synthetic (title) 59ms 62ms 76ms 302ms 1795ms 13.9s
synthetic (string inside object) 64ms 67ms 73ms 358ms 1910ms 10.4s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 45ms 63ms 84ms 298ms 617ms 10.9s
article (body) 15ms 17ms 18ms 34ms 65ms 5.6s
article (string inside object) 42ms 44ms 46ms 148ms 331ms 7.4s
article (string inside array) 48ms 49ms 53ms 57ms 272ms 7.3s
synthetic (title) 55ms 60ms 86ms 394ms 1463ms 13.7s
synthetic (string inside object) 53ms 55ms 60ms 223ms 884ms 7.8s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/groq-js-1.x branch from c05c2f2 to c3d9f2a Compare March 6, 2025 18:27
Copy link
Contributor

@rneatherway rneatherway left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I made the release of groq-js.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant