Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(core): releases edit events error when calculating differences #8632

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 14, 2025

Conversation

pedrobonamin
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Pre-read

The Releases Activity Panel was previously relying on release documents from the releases store. Initially, these documents were complete. However, we recently introduced a projection to the documents, which means they are now partial.

The activity panel retrieves changes using the transactions endpoint and applies Mendoza patches to the documents. However, Mendoza patches require complete documents to function correctly—they do not work with partial documents.


Fix

This PR refactors the getReleaseEditEvents observable to use the new observeDocument observable, which ensures that complete documents are returned. This resolves the issue where Mendoza patches failed due to incomplete data.


Other Changes

  • The global listener was filtering out system documents, and since releases are classified as system documents, they were also being excluded.
  • To allow observeDocument to function correctly, this PR removes that filter, ensuring system documents (including releases) are properly observed.

What to review

Any side effect to consider on the listener change?

Testing

The corresponding tests are updated.
Opening a release activity panel should not error in any case.

Notes for release

Fixes an error when getting the release edit events in the release activity panel

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 14, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 14, 2025 10:18am
performance-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 14, 2025 10:18am
test-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 14, 2025 10:18am
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 14, 2025 10:18am
test-next-studio ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 14, 2025 10:18am

@pedrobonamin pedrobonamin requested a review from bjoerge February 14, 2025 08:54
@pedrobonamin pedrobonamin marked this pull request as ready for review February 14, 2025 08:54
@pedrobonamin pedrobonamin requested review from a team as code owners February 14, 2025 08:54
Copy link
Contributor

No changes to documentation

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 14, 2025

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 42.68% 54205 / 126992
🔵 Statements 42.68% 54205 / 126992
🔵 Functions 48.06% 2783 / 5790
🔵 Branches 78.95% 10418 / 13195
File Coverage
File Stmts Branches Functions Lines Uncovered Lines
Changed Files
packages/sanity/src/core/preview/createGlobalListener.ts 100% 100% 33.33% 100%
packages/sanity/src/core/releases/tool/detail/events/getReleaseEditEvents.ts 96.22% 95.65% 100% 96.22% 63-64, 147-148
packages/sanity/src/core/releases/tool/detail/events/getReleaseEvents.ts 26.74% 100% 0% 26.74% 54-131
Generated in workflow #30373 for commit 5e7d36d by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

bjoerge
bjoerge previously approved these changes Feb 14, 2025
Copy link
Member

@bjoerge bjoerge left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

packages/sanity/src/core/preview/createGlobalListener.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 14, 2025

Component Testing Report Updated Feb 14, 2025 10:26 AM (UTC)

❌ Failed Tests (3) -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 10s 15 0 0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 12s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 2m 35s 3 0 3
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 53s 11 7 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 15s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 27s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 8s 15 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 38s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 2m 6s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 13s 3 9 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 27s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 45s 21 0 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 14, 2025

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Fri, 14 Feb 2025 10:22:53 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 27.8 efps (36ms) 27.8 efps (36ms) +0ms (-/-%)
article (body) 72.5 efps (14ms) 72.7 efps (14ms) -0ms (-/-%)
article (string inside object) 28.6 efps (35ms) 27.8 efps (36ms) +1ms (+2.9%)
article (string inside array) 25.0 efps (40ms) 25.0 efps (40ms) +0ms (-/-%)
recipe (name) 50.0 efps (20ms) 48.8 efps (21ms) +1ms (+2.5%)
recipe (description) 52.6 efps (19ms) 55.6 efps (18ms) -1ms (-5.3%)
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (5ms) 99.9+ efps (5ms) -0ms (-/-%)
synthetic (title) 21.3 efps (47ms) 20.4 efps (49ms) +2ms (+4.3%)
synthetic (string inside object) 21.3 efps (47ms) 20.0 efps (50ms) +3ms (+6.4%)

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 36ms 38ms 43ms 245ms 139ms 9.8s
article (body) 14ms 15ms 34ms 96ms 247ms 5.6s
article (string inside object) 35ms 38ms 43ms 90ms 372ms 6.8s
article (string inside array) 40ms 43ms 49ms 169ms 292ms 6.8s
recipe (name) 20ms 22ms 24ms 52ms 0ms 7.7s
recipe (description) 19ms 19ms 21ms 31ms 0ms 4.6s
recipe (instructions) 5ms 7ms 8ms 11ms 0ms 3.1s
synthetic (title) 47ms 51ms 74ms 349ms 768ms 12.4s
synthetic (string inside object) 47ms 50ms 57ms 582ms 1028ms 8.3s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 36ms 38ms 44ms 319ms 294ms 10.2s
article (body) 14ms 15ms 22ms 194ms 187ms 5.4s
article (string inside object) 36ms 40ms 47ms 208ms 325ms 6.7s
article (string inside array) 40ms 42ms 45ms 281ms 338ms 6.8s
recipe (name) 21ms 22ms 26ms 48ms 8ms 7.2s
recipe (description) 18ms 18ms 20ms 33ms 0ms 4.5s
recipe (instructions) 5ms 7ms 8ms 16ms 0ms 3.2s
synthetic (title) 49ms 52ms 56ms 425ms 837ms 12.8s
synthetic (string inside object) 50ms 53ms 60ms 112ms 616ms 7.7s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

@pedrobonamin
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bjoerge this needs re approval after removing the [] from the filter 5e7d36d

@pedrobonamin pedrobonamin merged commit 53aa0fc into next Feb 14, 2025
63 checks passed
@pedrobonamin pedrobonamin deleted the sapp-2089 branch February 14, 2025 11:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants