fix(pte): tools are active only when all blocks use the tool #6524
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* fix(core): set scroll boundary to nearest * fix(core): add smooth scroll behavior * fix(sanity): remove smooth behavior --------- Co-authored-by: RitaDias <[email protected]>
…ument in PTE (#6440) * fix(portable-text-editor): issue shown in tests re stega. use duplicate code * test(playwright-ct): add test * chore(sanity): remove prettier linting * test(sanity): fix missing snapshot * test(sanity): update test after realising the test would pass always if comparing object number * chore: test unicode removal * chore: test unicode removal * chore(@sanity): remove old solution * fix(@sanity/block-tools): unicode issue. remove vercel/stega and move to block-tools * test(@sanity/block-tools): for unicode * fix(@sanity/block-tools): utf8 characters weren't beign filtered. using the vercel/stega * chore: update lock file * (chore): update pnpm lock
Co-authored-by: github-merge-queue[bot] <118344674+github-merge-queue[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…ument in PTE (#6440) * fix(portable-text-editor): issue shown in tests re stega. use duplicate code * test(playwright-ct): add test * chore(sanity): remove prettier linting * test(sanity): fix missing snapshot * test(sanity): update test after realising the test would pass always if comparing object number * chore: test unicode removal * chore: test unicode removal * chore(@sanity): remove old solution * fix(@sanity/block-tools): unicode issue. remove vercel/stega and move to block-tools * test(@sanity/block-tools): for unicode * fix(@sanity/block-tools): utf8 characters weren't beign filtered. using the vercel/stega * chore: update lock file * (chore): update pnpm lock
Co-authored-by: github-merge-queue[bot] <118344674+github-merge-queue[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…ument in PTE (#6440) * fix(portable-text-editor): issue shown in tests re stega. use duplicate code * test(playwright-ct): add test * chore(sanity): remove prettier linting * test(sanity): fix missing snapshot * test(sanity): update test after realising the test would pass always if comparing object number * chore: test unicode removal * chore: test unicode removal * chore(@sanity): remove old solution * fix(@sanity/block-tools): unicode issue. remove vercel/stega and move to block-tools * test(@sanity/block-tools): for unicode * fix(@sanity/block-tools): utf8 characters weren't beign filtered. using the vercel/stega * chore: update lock file * (chore): update pnpm lock
Co-authored-by: github-merge-queue[bot] <118344674+github-merge-queue[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
1 Ignored Deployment
|
|
No changes to documentation |
|
Component Testing Report Updated May 2, 2024 2:28 PM (UTC)
|
jtpetty
reviewed
May 1, 2024
| if (selectedBlocks.length > 0) { | ||
| return true | ||
| return selectedBlocks.every( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
do we need to return every here or do we just care that there is > 0 blocks that meet this condition?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We do care that every block has the list style. For example if the selection was on the following:
First block
- List second block
Third block
we'd have 3 selectedBlocks, but only 1 would have bullet list style, so we'd want to return false
jtpetty
approved these changes
May 2, 2024
This was referenced May 31, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
EDX-801
What to review
Different approaches are needed for each of marks, annotations and lists
The high level approach is that instead of a condition on
someof the selected blocks being bold, or a link, or bullet list, noweveryselected block must be.The most cumbersome implementation is for annotations (links). This requires a new
isAnnotationActivemethod inpackages/@sanity/portable-text-editor/src/editor/plugins/createWithEditableAPI.tswhich must expand every selected block to determine the type of mark definitions in the selection, before then applying theeverylogic to all spans in the selectionTesting
Notes for release
fixes issues in the PTE where tools would show as being active for a selection when only part of the selection used the tool.
Now tools will show as active only when all highlighted selections use the tool