-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 393
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
made case class to deal with model selector metadata #39
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9151984
made case class to deal with model selector metadata
leahmcguire 571a167
Merge branch 'master' into lm/metadata
tovbinm c1c7216
added error for metrics extraction
leahmcguire 9b56c15
moving richparammap
leahmcguire 2d9f761
Merge branch 'master' into lm/metadata
tovbinm f4411a4
addressing comments
leahmcguire 875a991
Merge branch 'lm/metadata' of github.com:salesforce/TransmogrifAI int…
leahmcguire 8096a85
Merge branch 'master' into lm/metadata
leahmcguire af415ed
made metric eval robust to extension
leahmcguire a40b135
Merge branch 'master' into lm/metadata
leahmcguire e6fd07a
Merge branch 'master' into lm/metadata
leahmcguire bf26e54
fixed test
leahmcguire 42498da
Merge branch 'lm/metadata' of github.com:salesforce/TransmogrifAI int…
leahmcguire 7082038
more test fixes
leahmcguire File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
307 changes: 84 additions & 223 deletions
307
core/src/main/scala/com/salesforce/op/ModelInsights.scala
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it weird to have evaluator names to be an evaluator metrics. perhaps lets just have evaluation metric and drop the
OpEvaluatorNames
completely. wdyt?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is not a change I introduced it was always the case because there are metrics that are grouped by the evaluator. if we want to restructure it it should be in a separate PR