-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Entry widget and secure conversations v2 #1036
Draft
rasmustautsglia
wants to merge
109
commits into
development
Choose a base branch
from
feature/entry-widget-and-secure-conversations-v2
base: development
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Entry widget and secure conversations v2 #1036
rasmustautsglia
wants to merge
109
commits into
development
from
feature/entry-widget-and-secure-conversations-v2
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rasmustautsglia
changed the title
Feature/entry widget and secure conversations v2
Entry widget and secure conversations v2
Sep 9, 2024
rasmustautsglia
force-pushed
the
feature/entry-widget-and-secure-conversations-v2
branch
2 times, most recently
from
September 23, 2024 18:11
cd21e48
to
fa640ff
Compare
ykyivskyi-gl
force-pushed
the
feature/entry-widget-and-secure-conversations-v2
branch
from
October 8, 2024 08:44
cfb864f
to
17349d7
Compare
rasmustautsglia
force-pushed
the
feature/entry-widget-and-secure-conversations-v2
branch
from
October 17, 2024 11:07
cdf1e06
to
cac42b4
Compare
igorkravchenko
force-pushed
the
feature/entry-widget-and-secure-conversations-v2
branch
from
October 17, 2024 15:49
aed3878
to
0228f93
Compare
igorkravchenko
force-pushed
the
feature/entry-widget-and-secure-conversations-v2
branch
from
October 18, 2024 14:33
7a5e1a8
to
f4300ab
Compare
@rasmustautsglia I think the target branch should be changed to 'development', shouldn't it? |
igorkravchenko
force-pushed
the
feature/entry-widget-and-secure-conversations-v2
branch
from
October 21, 2024 07:22
f4300ab
to
ef727e2
Compare
EgorovEI
force-pushed
the
feature/entry-widget-and-secure-conversations-v2
branch
2 times, most recently
from
October 22, 2024 11:31
68ade5b
to
e0349d0
Compare
EgorovEI
force-pushed
the
feature/entry-widget-and-secure-conversations-v2
branch
from
October 22, 2024 12:06
e0349d0
to
6606af7
Compare
igorkravchenko
force-pushed
the
feature/entry-widget-and-secure-conversations-v2
branch
from
November 1, 2024 14:18
9b2e7c1
to
14d76ce
Compare
EgorovEI
force-pushed
the
feature/entry-widget-and-secure-conversations-v2
branch
from
November 11, 2024 13:22
ea35791
to
1ea3ecf
Compare
EgorovEI
force-pushed
the
development
branch
from
November 12, 2024 08:15
0212a21
to
60eac36
Compare
EgorovEI
force-pushed
the
feature/entry-widget-and-secure-conversations-v2
branch
2 times, most recently
from
December 5, 2024 14:43
50ee073
to
d507d17
Compare
EgorovEI
force-pushed
the
feature/entry-widget-and-secure-conversations-v2
branch
from
December 5, 2024 18:47
d507d17
to
37c9a9d
Compare
EgorovEI
force-pushed
the
feature/entry-widget-and-secure-conversations-v2
branch
from
December 13, 2024 14:00
76c87b1
to
c57e113
Compare
EgorovEI
force-pushed
the
development
branch
from
December 17, 2024 16:31
97b0165
to
eb3a133
Compare
EgorovEI
force-pushed
the
feature/entry-widget-and-secure-conversations-v2
branch
from
December 17, 2024 16:35
c735b3e
to
e2ee5e6
Compare
ykyivskyi-gl
force-pushed
the
feature/entry-widget-and-secure-conversations-v2
branch
from
December 27, 2024 10:29
ee51db8
to
fdaf96c
Compare
EgorovEI
force-pushed
the
feature/entry-widget-and-secure-conversations-v2
branch
from
December 31, 2024 10:38
01e024c
to
7ad0d5b
Compare
Both platforms now also log when ongoing engagement MOB-3909
Currently if there visitor is enqueuing and decides to initiate engagement again, then that will cancel their queue ticket and create a new one. This is really bad from UX perspective because a person would potentially lose a great spot in a long queue, even though their reason was to just resume the existing one. The new solution would check for the engagement kind and if the current one matches the new one, then instead of cancelling the old, the old one is resumed. There were technical difficulties to achieve that because currently the SDK converts EngagementKind to simplified mediaType, which makes this upgrade impossible. This PR simplifies the approach significantly and allows the SDK to rely on EngagementKind as long as possible and only use mediaType when absolutely needed. This PR lays a pathway forward to continue removing mediaType from places where EngagementKind is suffice. MOB-3931
Restoring engagement on configuration step or during authentication turns `skipLiveObservationConfirmations` value to `true` to prevent displaying the dialog. This value never turns back to default value, which is `false` without re-configuring the SDK. This commit fixes it. MOB-3964
This commit introduces: - the logic for restoring the bubble for the cases when SC engagement gets: - restored from Follow Up; - started using Outbound Message feature; - started while visitor is on SecureConversation.Confirmation screen - unit tests MOB-3951
This commit fixes the issue when Interactor instance and media are captured during EngagementLauncher creation. MOB-3963
When visitor is enqueued, instead of showing all the options in EntryWidget, We show only the one that the visitor is enqueued to. MOB-3950
EgorovEI
force-pushed
the
feature/entry-widget-and-secure-conversations-v2
branch
from
January 24, 2025 09:40
86ce9ea
to
1fa66b0
Compare
This commit introduces the logic erasing `interactor.state` to align its behaviour in case when deauthentication happended during trasferred SC. MOB-3972
If integrator creates EntryWidget and then re-configures the SDK, EntryWidgets stops handling engagement states, because it owns outdated interactor instance. To solve this problem we need to re-subscribe on interactor.currentEngagement property once the SDK is reconfigured. This PR does that by making interactor as a published property. EntryWidget will always be up to date with the most recent interactor. MOB-3965
Rely on 'Engagement.actionOnEnd' to determine the need to present survey. MOB-3966
Handle case when engagement is ended with 'actionOnEnd = .retain' by switching to SC from Live Chat, instead of ending engagement. MOB-3978
- Snackbar shown for video/audio enqueueing if chat/SC running - Snackbar shown for chat/SC enqueueing if video/audio running
Since transferred SC behaves as Secure Conversation queue ticket, we don't need to take it into account during evaluating EntryWidget's viewState. MOB-3992
Add unit test that ensures that 'ChatCoordinator' calls 'migrate' on 'TranscriptModel' and asserts migration related properties. MOB-3989
This commit introduces a logic: - Don't restore bubble for transferred SC; - Don't end transferred SC when close button is pressed on Chat screen; - Showing close button instead of end one in case of transferred SC; - unit tests; MOB-3974
Interactor state had a mixture of new and old approach. This PR removes didSet and instead subscribes for updates directly. MOB-3979
This commit: - fixes enqueueing to Live engagement during Transferred SC; - fixes Chat UI for case when SC queue ticket created by Transferred SC gets accepted by operator; - fixes chatType for the case if visitor leaves current conversation in favour of Live engagement; - unit tests; MOB-3973
After Interactor was refactored to be Published property, interactorProviding was replaced with interactorPublisher using Combine MOB-3982
- Show already in contact snackbar for chat/SC enqueueing if audio/video already enqueued - Maximize bubble for chat/SC enqueueing if chat/SC already enqueued - Show already in contact snackbar for audio/video enqueueing if chat/SC already enqueued - Maximize bubble for audio/video enqueueing if audio/video already enqueued
Fix file upload issue by calling 'TranscriptModel.start'. MOB-3993
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What was solved?
Release notes:
Additional info:
Screenshots: