Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add working implementation of 1D and nD potential landscape computation #28

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Nov 26, 2024

Conversation

kushaangupta
Copy link
Collaborator

Closes #27

@kushaangupta kushaangupta marked this pull request as draft November 11, 2024 16:47
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

neuro_py/util/array.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
neuro_py/util/array.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Owner

@ryanharvey1 ryanharvey1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See comments on static typing.

Add some type of test for potential_landscape and potential_landscape_nd

@kushaangupta kushaangupta marked this pull request as ready for review November 22, 2024 03:35
Copy link

review-notebook-app bot commented Nov 23, 2024

View / edit / reply to this conversation on ReviewNB

lolaBerkowitz commented on 2024-11-23T00:20:08Z
----------------------------------------------------------------

Format the entire notebook Black


Copy link

review-notebook-app bot commented Nov 23, 2024

View / edit / reply to this conversation on ReviewNB

lolaBerkowitz commented on 2024-11-23T00:20:09Z
----------------------------------------------------------------

Add language to describe the purpose of this section. For example, I'm looking at the plots and not knowing what I'm supposed to take from them. Is the fit in subplot (axis 2) good because it's shape matches the potential landscape? Include inferences/take-aways for each plot.


Copy link

review-notebook-app bot commented Nov 23, 2024

View / edit / reply to this conversation on ReviewNB

lolaBerkowitz commented on 2024-11-23T00:20:10Z
----------------------------------------------------------------

Add inferences/take-aways to make the purpose of this section more clear


Copy link

review-notebook-app bot commented Nov 23, 2024

View / edit / reply to this conversation on ReviewNB

lolaBerkowitz commented on 2024-11-23T00:20:11Z
----------------------------------------------------------------

Why is ntrials so high (doesn't seem feasible for most data)? Can you reference influence of parameter values.


@lolaBerkowitz
Copy link
Collaborator

Make sure everything is formatted in Black. For the notebook, the figures look amazing but please add some descriptions/inferences to all sections. What is the purpose, what is the take home etc.

@kushaangupta kushaangupta merged commit 8492180 into main Nov 26, 2024
6 checks passed
@kushaangupta kushaangupta deleted the representation-geodyn branch November 26, 2024 23:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add n-dimensional attractor dynamics computation
3 participants