Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor aas-core-to-basyx #8

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2024
Merged

Conversation

s-heppner
Copy link

No description provided.

@s-heppner s-heppner merged commit 151e8a4 into BaSyxCore/main Feb 1, 2024
2 of 14 checks passed
@s-heppner s-heppner deleted the BaSyxCore/ScriptRefactor branch February 1, 2024 08:38
Frosty2500 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2024
…sitory

Previously, we used the `rwth-iat` fork to pull the SDK from,
inside the docker file, due to the fact, that the `eclipse-basyx`
repository, did not contain the necessary branch.
Now that this is the case, it makes sense to always use the
official repository.

This also fixes the dependency issues of missing dependencies, as
they have been fixed in the main repository.

Fix #8
Fix #9
s-heppner added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2024
…sitory

Previously, we used the `rwth-iat` fork to pull the SDK from,
inside the docker file, due to the fact, that the `eclipse-basyx`
repository, did not contain the necessary branch.
Now that this is the case, it makes sense to always use the
official repository.

This also fixes the dependency issues of missing dependencies, as
they have been fixed in the main repository.

Fix #8
Fix #9
Ornella33 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2025
…sitory

Previously, we used the `rwth-iat` fork to pull the SDK from,
inside the docker file, due to the fact, that the `eclipse-basyx`
repository, did not contain the necessary branch.
Now that this is the case, it makes sense to always use the
official repository.

This also fixes the dependency issues of missing dependencies, as
they have been fixed in the main repository.

Fix #8
Fix #9
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant