-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 113
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow building without the pem
crate feature
#204
Conversation
Would you mind adding a CI job that tests for this, to help us avoid regressing this again? |
1e7fb6e
to
00765e0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, looks great!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you
This is from the branch protection rules falling out of sync with the updated matrix-based task name. I think we should merge without waiting for requirements to be met and then fix those rules. |
I think this warrants a 0.12.1 bugfix release. |
Currently trying to build like this:
will fail because it can't find
pem::PemError
orError::PemError
.Simply adding a
cfg
guard on this implementation fixes the issue.