-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix documentation for is_X_feature_detected! #94095
Conversation
These are now properly documented for all architectures and the stability attributes in the docs are now correctly displayed.
r? @dtolnay (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit 2b3fa06 has been approved by |
This should be included in the beta cutoff for tomorrow. @bors p=1 |
Fix documentation for is_X_feature_detected! These are now properly documented for all architectures and the stability attributes in the docs are now correctly displayed. This addresses this comment by `@ehuss:` rust-lang#90271 (comment) cc `@adamgemmell`
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (f838a42): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results. 7 results were found to be statistically significant but too small to be relevant. If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression |
These are now properly documented for all architectures and the
stability attributes in the docs are now correctly displayed.
This addresses this comment by @ehuss: #90271 (comment)
cc @adamgemmell