Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Perform lifetime resolution on the AST for lowering #91557

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Apr 28, 2022

Conversation

cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor

@cjgillot cjgillot commented Dec 5, 2021

Lifetime resolution is currently implemented several times. Once during lowering in order to introduce in-band lifetimes, and once in the resolve_lifetimes query. However, due to the global nature of lifetime resolution and how it interferes with hygiene, it is better suited on the AST.

This PR implements a first draft of lifetime resolution on the AST. For now, we specifically target named lifetimes and everything we need to remove lifetime resolution from lowering. Some diagnostics have already been ported, and sometimes made more precise using available hygiene information. Follow-up PRs will address in particular the resolution of anonymous lifetimes on the AST.

We reuse the rib design of the current resolution framework. Specific LifetimeRib and LifetimeRibKind types are introduced. The most important variant is LifetimeRibKind::Generics, which happens each time we encounter something which may introduce generic lifetime parameters. It can be an item or a for<...> binder. The LifetimeBinderKind specifies how this rib behaves with respect to in-band lifetimes.

r? @petrochenkov

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Some changes occurred in src/tools/rustfmt.

cc @calebcartwright

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 5, 2021
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

Blocked on #91403.

@petrochenkov petrochenkov added S-blocked Status: Blocked on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 6, 2021
@apiraino apiraino added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Dec 9, 2021
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors

This comment was marked as resolved.

@rustbot rustbot added the T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Dec 18, 2021
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors

This comment was marked as resolved.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors

This comment was marked as resolved.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors r=petrochenkov

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 27, 2022

📌 Commit 21b6d23 has been approved by petrochenkov

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Apr 27, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 27, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 21b6d23 with merge c95346b...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 28, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: petrochenkov
Pushing c95346b to master...

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (c95346b): comparison url.

Summary:

  • Primary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
  • Secondary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvements found
Regressions 😿
(primary)
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
All 😿 🎉
(primary)
count1 0 0 0 3 0
mean2 N/A N/A N/A -0.2% N/A
max N/A N/A N/A -0.3% N/A

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Footnotes

  1. number of relevant changes

  2. the arithmetic mean of the percent change

@cjgillot cjgillot deleted the ast-lifetimes-named branch April 28, 2022 16:10
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Apr 29, 2022

This caused a regression on nightly. The beta cutoff is somewhat soonish, so if we can't land a fix by next week we should revert and try again in a new pr

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Apr 29, 2022

Regression issue: #96540

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants