Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

⬆️ rust-analyzer #90255

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 26, 2021
Merged

Conversation

lnicola
Copy link
Member

@lnicola lnicola commented Oct 25, 2021

r? @GhoSe sorry, @ghost

@lnicola
Copy link
Member Author

lnicola commented Oct 25, 2021

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 25, 2021

📌 Commit 25a82fd has been approved by lnicola

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Oct 25, 2021
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2021
…=lnicola

⬆️ rust-analyzer

r? ~~`@ghose~~` sorry, `@ghost`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2021
…askrgr

Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#89581 (Add -Z no-unique-section-names to reduce ELF header bloat.)
 - rust-lang#90196 (Fix and extent ControlFlow `traverse_inorder` example)
 - rust-lang#90255 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer)
 - rust-lang#90266 (Prevent duplicate caller bounds candidates by exposing default substs in Unevaluated)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit d35ecb9 into rust-lang:master Oct 26, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.58.0 milestone Oct 26, 2021
@lnicola lnicola deleted the rust-analyzer-2021-10-25 branch October 26, 2021 04:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants