-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use command line metadata path if provided #85362
Conversation
r? @estebank (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
Looks like test failures are spurious. |
@estebank ping? |
For the tests, you need to write a If you need a hand writing a new makefile test, ping me. r=me for the code itself as it is now. |
If the command-line has `--emit metadata=some/path/libfoo.rmeta` then use that. Closes rust-lang#85356
@estebank I've added run-make tests. |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit b14b7c6 has been approved by |
Use command line metadata path if provided If the command-line has `--emit metadata=some/path/libfoo.rmeta` then use that. Closes rust-lang#85356 I couldn't find any existing tests for the `--emit TYPE=PATH` command line syntax, so I wasn't sure how to test this aside from ad-hoc manual testing. Is there a ui test type for "generated output file with expected name"?
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
If the command-line has
--emit metadata=some/path/libfoo.rmeta
thenuse that.
Closes #85356
I couldn't find any existing tests for the
--emit TYPE=PATH
command line syntax, so I wasn't sure how to test this aside from ad-hoc manual testing. Is there a ui test type for "generated output file with expected name"?