Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2229 migration: Don't try resolve regions before writeback #83364

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2021

Conversation

arora-aman
Copy link
Member

In the analysis use resolve_vars_if_possible instead of fully_resolve,
because we might not have performed regionck yet.

Fixes: #83176

r? @nikomatsakis

In the analysis use `resolve_vars_if_possible` instead of `fully_resolve`,
because we might not have performed regionck yet.

Fixes: rust-lang#83176
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 22, 2021
@jyn514 jyn514 added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Mar 22, 2021
@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 22, 2021

📌 Commit 74d7731 has been approved by nikomatsakis

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 22, 2021
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2021
2229 migration: Don't try resolve regions before writeback

In the analysis use `resolve_vars_if_possible` instead of `fully_resolve`,
because we might not have performed regionck yet.

Fixes: rust-lang#83176

r? `@nikomatsakis`
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2021
2229 migration: Don't try resolve regions before writeback

In the analysis use `resolve_vars_if_possible` instead of `fully_resolve`,
because we might not have performed regionck yet.

Fixes: rust-lang#83176

r? `@nikomatsakis`
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 24, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 74d7731 with merge 008d71ca737210d8ac95adcb23d333cd0a6b26f9...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 24, 2021

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Mar 24, 2021
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job armhf-gnu failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

crates.io returned 503, @bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 24, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 24, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 74d7731 with merge f5fe425...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 24, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: nikomatsakis
Pushing f5fe425 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Mar 24, 2021
@bors bors merged commit f5fe425 into rust-lang:master Mar 24, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.53.0 milestone Mar 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ICE when using pattern and lambda with disjoint_capture_drop_reorder
8 participants