-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Stabilize core::slice::fill
#79213
Stabilize core::slice::fill
#79213
Conversation
@rfcbot merge |
Team member @m-ou-se has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged team members: No concerns currently listed. Once a majority of reviewers approve (and at most 2 approvals are outstanding), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up! See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me. |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #79229) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. Note that reviewers usually do not review pull requests until merge conflicts are resolved! Once you resolve the conflicts, you should change the labels applied by bors to indicate that your PR is ready for review. Post this as a comment to change the labels:
|
I fixed the merge conflicts a few days ago, and CI is passing again. I think the label should be updated again to |
I think |
🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔 |
@Amanieu I'd be happy to put a PR up for that after this lands! |
The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete. As the automated representative of the governance process, I would like to thank the author for their work and everyone else who contributed. The RFC will be merged soon. |
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit 52eade1 has been approved by |
…=m-ou-se Stabilize `core::slice::fill` Tracking issue rust-lang#70758 Stabilizes the `core::slice::fill` API in Rust 1.50, adding a `memset` doc alias so people coming from C/C++ looking for this operation can find it in the docs. This API hasn't seen any changes since we changed the signature in rust-lang#71165, and it seems like the right time to propose stabilization. Thanks! r? `@m-ou-se`
…=m-ou-se Stabilize `core::slice::fill` Tracking issue rust-lang#70758 Stabilizes the `core::slice::fill` API in Rust 1.50, adding a `memset` doc alias so people coming from C/C++ looking for this operation can find it in the docs. This API hasn't seen any changes since we changed the signature in rust-lang#71165, and it seems like the right time to propose stabilization. Thanks! r? ``@m-ou-se``
⌛ Testing commit 52eade1 with merge 8b3b60ca2ef151d4e6951aaf1cb21460b6b29461... |
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
Oops; I forgot to remove the |
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit c2281cc has been approved by |
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#79213 (Stabilize `core::slice::fill`) - rust-lang#79999 (Refactored verbose print into a function) - rust-lang#80160 (Implemented a compiler diagnostic for move async mistake) - rust-lang#80274 (Rename rustc_middle::lint::LintSource) - rust-lang#80280 (Add installation commands to `x` tool README) - rust-lang#80319 (Fix elided lifetimes shown as `'_` on async functions) - rust-lang#80327 (Updated the match with the matches macro) - rust-lang#80330 (Fix typo in simplify_try.rs) - rust-lang#80340 (Don't unnecessarily override attrs for Module) - rust-lang#80342 (Fix typo) - rust-lang#80352 (BTreeMap: make test cases more explicit on failure) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Does this need |
Tracking issue #70758
Stabilizes the
core::slice::fill
API in Rust 1.50, adding amemset
doc alias so people coming from C/C++ looking for this operation can find it in the docs. This API hasn't seen any changes since we changed the signature in #71165, and it seems like the right time to propose stabilization. Thanks!r? @m-ou-se