Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move to intra doc links for std::io #75674

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 19, 2020

Conversation

poliorcetics
Copy link
Contributor

Helps with #75080.

@rustbot modify labels: T-doc, A-intra-doc-links, T-rustdoc

r? @jyn514

I had no problems with those files so I added some small links here and there.

@rustbot rustbot added the A-intra-doc-links Area: Intra-doc links, the ability to link to items in docs by name label Aug 18, 2020
@rustbot rustbot added A-docs Area: documentation for any part of the project, including the compiler, standard library, and tools T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 18, 2020
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 18, 2020
Copy link
Member

@jyn514 jyn514 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great, thanks for working on this :)

library/std/src/io/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
library/std/src/io/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
library/std/src/io/mod.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
library/std/src/io/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jyn514 jyn514 added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 19, 2020
@jyn514
Copy link
Member

jyn514 commented Aug 19, 2020

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 19, 2020

📌 Commit dad8e11 has been approved by jyn514

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Aug 19, 2020
tmandry added a commit to tmandry/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2020
…jyn514

Move to intra doc links for std::io

Helps with rust-lang#75080.

@rustbot modify labels: T-doc, A-intra-doc-links, T-rustdoc

r? @jyn514

I had no problems with those files so I added some small links here and there.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2020
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#75069 (move const param structural match checks to wfcheck)
 - rust-lang#75587 (mir building: fix some comments)
 - rust-lang#75593 (Adjust installation place for compiler docs)
 - rust-lang#75648 (Make OnceCell<T> transparent to dropck)
 - rust-lang#75649 (Fix intra-doc links for inherent impls that are both lang items and not the default impl)
 - rust-lang#75674 (Move to intra doc links for std::io)
 - rust-lang#75696 (Remove `#[cfg(miri)]` from OnceCell tests)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 0fdc8c0 into rust-lang:master Aug 19, 2020
@poliorcetics poliorcetics deleted the intra-links-std-io branch August 19, 2020 21:26
@jyn514 jyn514 removed the T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Aug 25, 2020
@cuviper cuviper added this to the 1.47.0 milestone May 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-docs Area: documentation for any part of the project, including the compiler, standard library, and tools A-intra-doc-links Area: Intra-doc links, the ability to link to items in docs by name S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants