-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 6 pull requests #69848
Rollup of 6 pull requests #69848
Conversation
Previously, attributes on 'if' expressions (e.g. #[attr] if true {}) were disallowed during parsing. This made it impossible for macros to perform any custom handling of such attributes (e.g. stripping them away), since a compilation error would be emitted before they ever had a chance to run. This PR permits attributes on 'if' expressions ('if-attrs' from here on). Both built-in attributes (e.g. `#[allow]`, `#[cfg]`) are supported. We still do *not* accept attributes on 'other parts' of an if-else chain. That is, the following code snippet still fails to parse: ```rust if true {} #[attr] else if false {} else #[attr] if false {} #[attr] else {} ```
Co-Authored-By: bjorn3 <[email protected]>
Additionally whenever possible match C API provided by the LLVM.
Although `stack_overflow::init` runs very early in the process, even before `main`, there may already be signal handlers installed for things like the address sanitizer. In that case, just leave it alone, and don't bother trying to allocate our own signal stacks either.
…=Centril Permit attributes on 'if' expressions Previously, attributes on 'if' expressions (e.g. `#[attr] if true {}`) were disallowed during parsing. This made it impossible for macros to perform any custom handling of such attributes (e.g. stripping them away), since a compilation error would be emitted before they ever had a chance to run. This PR permits attributes on 'if' expressions ('if-attrs' from here on). Both built-in attributes (e.g. `#[allow]`, `#[cfg]`) and proc-macro attributes are supported. We still do *not* accept attributes on 'other parts' of an if-else chain. That is, the following code snippet still fails to parse: ```rust if true {} #[attr] else if false {} else #[attr] if false {} #[attr] else {} ``` Closes rust-lang#68618
…nison Extend search I realized that when looking for "struct:String" in the rustdoc search for example, the "in arguments" and "returned" tabs were always empty. After some investigation, I realized it was because we only provided the name, and not the type, making it impossible to pass the "type filtering" check. To resolve this, I added the type alongside the name. Note for the future: we could improve this by instead only registering the path id and use the path dictionary directly. The only problem with that solution (which I already tested) is that it becomes complicated for types in other crates. It'd force us to handle both case with an id and a case with `(name, type)`. I found the current PR big enough to not want to provide it directly. However, I think this is definitely worth it to make it work this way in the future. About the two tests I added: they don't have much interest except checking that we actually have something returned in the search in the cases of a type filtering with and without literal search. I also had to update a bit the test script to add the new locally global (haha) variable I created (`NO_TYPE_FILTER`). I added this variable to make the code easier to read than just "-1". r? @kinnison cc @ollie27
unix: Don't override existing SIGSEGV/BUS handlers Although `stack_overflow::init` runs very early in the process, even before `main`, there may already be signal handlers installed for things like the address sanitizer. In that case, just leave it alone, and don't bother trying to allocate our own signal stacks either. Fixes rust-lang#69524.
Ensure that validity only raises validity errors For now, only as a debug-assertion (similar to const-prop detecting errors that allocate). Now includes rust-lang#69646. [Relative diff](RalfJung/rust@layout-visitor...RalfJung:validity-errors). r? @oli-obk
librustc_codegen_llvm: Use slices in preference to 0-terminated strings Additionally whenever possible match C API provided by the LLVM.
Add more regression tests Closes rust-lang#54239 Closes rust-lang#57200 Closes rust-lang#57201 Closes rust-lang#60473 Closes rust-lang#64620 Closes rust-lang#67166 r? @Centril
@bors r+ p=1001 rollup=never |
📌 Commit 77da717 has been approved by |
🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 1000, this pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened |
⌛ Testing commit 77da717 with merge 8e0068aef5c1495d65a9cabd07defc404fcf43e5... |
Your PR failed (pretty log, raw log). Through arcane magic we have determined that the following fragments from the build log may contain information about the problem. Click to expand the log.
I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
💔 Test failed - checks-azure |
@bors retry |
⌛ Testing commit 77da717 with merge 4d3db1686a65c1e0e2646f4bc8c10f83e08eae55... |
The job Click to expand the log.
I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
💔 Test failed - checks-azure |
Successful merges:
Failed merges:
r? @ghost