-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
More explicit diagnostic when using a vec![]
in a pattern
#63399
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
r? @eddyb (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
label
Aug 9, 2019
r? @oli-obk |
Centril
reviewed
Aug 9, 2019
``` error: unexpected `(` after qualified path --> $DIR/vec-macro-in-pattern.rs:3:14 | LL | Some(vec![x]) => (), | ^^^^^^^ | | | unexpected `(` after qualified path | in this macro invocation | use a slice pattern here instead | = help: for more information, see https://doc.rust-lang.org/edition-guide/rust-2018/slice-patterns.html = note: this warning originates in a macro outside of the current crate (in Nightly builds, run with -Z external-macro-backtrace for more info) ```
r=me if you want with issue filed + refactoring :) |
@bors r=Centril |
📌 Commit 75c5ad2 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Aug 9, 2019
r? @Centril |
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 9, 2019
More explicit diagnostic when using a `vec![]` in a pattern ``` error: unexpected `(` after qualified path --> $DIR/vec-macro-in-pattern.rs:3:14 | LL | Some(vec![x]) => (), | ^^^^^^^ | | | unexpected `(` after qualified path | in this macro invocation | use a slice pattern here instead | = help: for more information, see https://doc.rust-lang.org/edition-guide/rust-2018/slice-patterns.html = note: this warning originates in a macro outside of the current crate (in Nightly builds, run with -Z external-macro-backtrace for more info) ``` Fix rust-lang#61933.
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 10, 2019
More explicit diagnostic when using a `vec![]` in a pattern ``` error: unexpected `(` after qualified path --> $DIR/vec-macro-in-pattern.rs:3:14 | LL | Some(vec![x]) => (), | ^^^^^^^ | | | unexpected `(` after qualified path | in this macro invocation | use a slice pattern here instead | = help: for more information, see https://doc.rust-lang.org/edition-guide/rust-2018/slice-patterns.html = note: this warning originates in a macro outside of the current crate (in Nightly builds, run with -Z external-macro-backtrace for more info) ``` Fix rust-lang#61933.
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 10, 2019
More explicit diagnostic when using a `vec![]` in a pattern ``` error: unexpected `(` after qualified path --> $DIR/vec-macro-in-pattern.rs:3:14 | LL | Some(vec![x]) => (), | ^^^^^^^ | | | unexpected `(` after qualified path | in this macro invocation | use a slice pattern here instead | = help: for more information, see https://doc.rust-lang.org/edition-guide/rust-2018/slice-patterns.html = note: this warning originates in a macro outside of the current crate (in Nightly builds, run with -Z external-macro-backtrace for more info) ``` Fix rust-lang#61933.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 10, 2019
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #63056 (Give built-in macros stable addresses in the standard library) - #63337 (Tweak mismatched types error) - #63350 (Use associated_type_bounds where applicable - closes #61738) - #63394 (Add test for issue 36804) - #63399 (More explicit diagnostic when using a `vec![]` in a pattern) - #63419 (check against more collisions for TypeId of fn pointer) - #63423 (Mention that tuple structs are private if any of their fields are) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix #61933.