Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 9 pull requests #42348

Merged
merged 24 commits into from
Jun 1, 2017
Merged

Rollup of 9 pull requests #42348

merged 24 commits into from
Jun 1, 2017

Conversation

scottmcm and others added 24 commits May 25, 2017 00:47
The easy parts of RFC 1859.  (Just the trait and the lowering, none of
the error message improvements nor the insta-stable impl for Option.)
Without that flag, LLVM generates unaligned memory access instructions, which are not allowed on ARMv5.

For example, the 'hello world' example from `cargo --new` failed with:
```
$ ./hello
Hello, world!
thread 'main' panicked at 'assertion failed: end <= len', src/libcollections/vec.rs:1113
note: Run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` for a backtrace.
```

I traced this error back to the following assembler code in `BufWriter::flush_buf`:
```
    6f44:       e28d0018        add     r0, sp, rust-lang#24
[...]
    6f54:       e280b005        add     fp, r0, rust-lang#5
[...]
    7018:       e5cd001c        strb    r0, [sp, rust-lang#28]
    701c:       e1a0082a        lsr     r0, sl, rust-lang#16
    7020:       03a01001        moveq   r1, #1
    7024:       e5cb0002        strb    r0, [fp, rust-lang#2]
    7028:       e1cba0b0        strh    sl, [fp]
```

Note that `fp` points to `sp + 29`, so the three `str*`-instructions should fill up a 32bit - value at `sp + 28`, which is later used as the value `n` in `Ok(n) => written += n`. This doesn't work on ARMv5 as the `strh` can't write to the unaligned contents of `fp`, so the upper bits of `n` won't get cleared, leading to the assertion failure in Vec::drain.

With `+strict-align`, the code works as expected.
Part of rust-lang#42171, in preparation for downgrading the contained `TraitRef` to
only its `substs`.
Rather than (ab)using Debug for outputting the type in plain text use the
alternate format parameter which already does exactly that. This fixes
type parameters for example which would output raw HTML.

Also cleans up adding parens around references to trait objects.
Lower `?` to `Try` instead of `Carrier`

The easy parts of rust-lang/rfcs#1859, whose FCP completed without further comments.

Just the trait and the lowering -- neither the error message improvements nor the insta-stable impl for Option nor exhaustive docs.

Based on a [github search](https://github.com/search?l=rust&p=1&q=question_mark_carrier&type=Code&utf8=%E2%9C%93), this will break the following:

- https://github.com/pfpacket/rust-9p/blob/00206e34c680198a0ac7c2f066cc2954187d4fac/src/serialize.rs#L38
- https://github.com/peterdelevoryas/bufparse/blob/b1325898f4fc2c67658049196c12da82548af350/src/result.rs#L50

The other results appear to be files from libcore or its tests.  I could also leave Carrier around after stage0 and `impl<T:Carrier> Try for T` if that would be better.

r? @nikomatsakis

Edit: Oh, and it might accidentally improve perf, based on rust-lang#37939 (comment), since `Try::into_result` for `Result` is an obvious no-op, unlike `Carrier::translate`.
…laumeGomez

rustdoc: Cleanup associated const value rendering

Rather than (ab)using Debug for outputting the type in plain text use the
alternate format parameter which already does exactly that. This fixes
type parameters for example which would output raw HTML.

Also cleans up adding parens around references to trait objects.
Upgrade ProjectionTy's Name to a DefId

Part of rust-lang#42171, in preparation for downgrading the contained `TraitRef` to
only its `substs`.

Some inline questions in the diff. Look for `FIXME(tschottdorf)`. These comments
should be addressed before merging.
Add the RLS to .exe, .msi, and .pkg installers

This directly addresses issue rust-lang#42157, adding the RLS as a non-default component in the mentioned installers. The windows installers appear to have the right functionality added, but I don't have a machine that runs OSX, so it would be great if someone could test whether my .pkg commit adds the RLS correctly. The final commit also fixes some formatting issues I'd noticed while working on the installers, but I don't know if that's within the scope of this PR, so input would be appreciated.
ARMv5 needs +strict-align

Without that flag, LLVM generates unaligned memory access instructions, which are not allowed on ARMv5.

For example, the 'hello world' example from `cargo --new` failed with:
```
$ ./hello
Hello, world!
thread 'main' panicked at 'assertion failed: end <= len', src/libcollections/vec.rs:1113
note: Run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` for a backtrace.
```

I traced this error back to the following assembler code in `BufWriter::flush_buf`:
```
    6f44:       e28d0018        add     r0, sp, rust-lang#24
[...]
    6f54:       e280b005        add     fp, r0, rust-lang#5
[...]
    7018:       e5cd001c        strb    r0, [sp, rust-lang#28]
    701c:       e1a0082a        lsr     r0, sl, rust-lang#16
    7020:       03a01001        moveq   r1, #1
    7024:       e5cb0002        strb    r0, [fp, rust-lang#2]
    7028:       e1cba0b0        strh    sl, [fp]
```

Note that `fp` points to `sp + 29`, so the three `str*`-instructions should fill up a 32bit - value at `sp + 28`, which is later used as the value `n` in `Ok(n) => written += n`. This doesn't work on ARMv5 as the `strh` can't write to the unaligned contents of `fp`, so the upper bits of `n` won't get cleared, leading to the assertion failure in Vec::drain.

With `+strict-align`, the code works as expected.
…l, r=nikomatsakis

associated_consts: check trait obligations and regionck for associated consts

Closes rust-lang#41323

r? @nikomatsakis
…recv-timeout-docs, r=QuietMisdreavus

Rewrite doc examples for `Receiver::recv_timeout`.

None
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @nikomatsakis (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Member Author

frewsxcv commented Jun 1, 2017

@bors r+ p=10

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 1, 2017

📌 Commit 9bd6dc7 has been approved by frewsxcv

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 1, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 9bd6dc7 with merge 38efb2e...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2017
Rollup of 9 pull requests

- Successful merges: #42136, #42275, #42286, #42297, #42302, #42306, #42314, #42324, #42347
- Failed merges:
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 1, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: frewsxcv
Pushing 38efb2e to master...

@bors bors merged commit 9bd6dc7 into rust-lang:master Jun 1, 2017
@Centril Centril added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 2, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.