Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

On-demandify the typechecking of item bodies #40540

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 29, 2017

Conversation

cramertj
Copy link
Member

Copy link
Contributor

@nikomatsakis nikomatsakis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looking good, one minor quibble

}
}

fn typeck_item_bodies<'a, 'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'a, 'tcx, 'tcx>, _: CrateNum) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

probably a good idea to have assert that the CrateNum is indeed LOCAL_CRATE

@cramertj cramertj force-pushed the check-bodies-as-query branch from 6b59aeb to ee584ac Compare March 18, 2017 04:28
@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 20, 2017

📌 Commit ee584ac has been approved by nikomatsakis

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 20, 2017

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #39628) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

tcx.visit_all_bodies_in_krate(|body_owner_def_id, _body_id| {
tcx.item_tables(body_owner_def_id);
});
ty::queries::typeck_item_bodies::get(tcx, DUMMY_SP, LOCAL_CRATE)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does the separate DepNode::TypeckBodiesKrate task even need to exist?

Copy link
Member Author

@cramertj cramertj Mar 21, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the moment, yes, because otherwise it causes and ICE with "read/write of Some(TypeckBodiesKrate) but no current task".

Should I try and fix this here somehow or just add a FIXME?

cc @nikomatsakis

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think a FIXME is a good idea.

@cramertj cramertj force-pushed the check-bodies-as-query branch from ee584ac to eacd2da Compare March 21, 2017 10:07
@cramertj
Copy link
Member Author

@nikomatsakis Added the FIXME. Anything else I should do to this?

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 23, 2017

📌 Commit 8c92044 has been approved by nikomatsakis

alexcrichton added a commit to alexcrichton/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2017
…ikomatsakis

On-demandify the typechecking of item bodies

r? @nikomatsakis
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2017
Rollup of 11 pull requests

- Successful merges: #40347, #40501, #40516, #40524, #40540, #40642, #40683, #40764, #40778, #40807, #40809
- Failed merges: #40771
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2017
Rollup of 11 pull requests

- Successful merges: #40347, #40501, #40516, #40524, #40540, #40642, #40683, #40764, #40778, #40807, #40809
- Failed merges: #40771
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 25, 2017

🔒 Merge conflict

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 26, 2017

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #40826) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@cramertj cramertj force-pushed the check-bodies-as-query branch from 8c92044 to 61cd190 Compare March 26, 2017 20:45
@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 27, 2017

📌 Commit 61cd190 has been approved by nikomatsakis

@cramertj cramertj force-pushed the check-bodies-as-query branch from 61cd190 to 8a27a51 Compare March 27, 2017 21:49
@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 27, 2017

📌 Commit 8a27a51 has been approved by nikomatsakis

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 29, 2017

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #40867) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@cramertj cramertj force-pushed the check-bodies-as-query branch from 8a27a51 to 3b10b4e Compare March 29, 2017 03:36
@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 29, 2017

📌 Commit 3b10b4e has been approved by nikomatsakis

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 29, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 3b10b4e with merge cf69238...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 29, 2017
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 29, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: nikomatsakis
Pushing cf69238 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 3b10b4e into rust-lang:master Mar 29, 2017
@cramertj cramertj deleted the check-bodies-as-query branch September 21, 2017 16:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants