-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rustc_borrowck: Stop suggesting the invalid syntax &mut raw const
#134244
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jieyouxu
approved these changes
Dec 13, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! I left some feedback, but looks good otherwise.
tests/ui/borrowck/no-invalid-mut-suggestion-for-raw-pointer-issue-127562.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@rustbot author |
So that it becomes easy for a later commit to return `None`.
The test fails in this commit. The next commit fixes it.
A legitimate suggestion would be to change from &raw const val to &raw mut val But until we have figured out how to make that happen we should at least stop suggesting invalid syntax.
f1baf80
to
f6cb227
Compare
&mut raw const
&mut raw const
jieyouxu
approved these changes
Dec 13, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
@bors r+ rollup |
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 13, 2024
…=jieyouxu rustc_borrowck: Stop suggesting the invalid syntax `&mut raw const` A legitimate suggestion would be to change from &raw const val to &raw mut val But until we have figured out how to make that happen we should at least stop suggesting invalid syntax. I recommend review commit-by-commit. Part of rust-lang#127562
This was referenced Dec 13, 2024
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2024
…=jieyouxu rustc_borrowck: Stop suggesting the invalid syntax `&mut raw const` A legitimate suggestion would be to change from &raw const val to &raw mut val But until we have figured out how to make that happen we should at least stop suggesting invalid syntax. I recommend review commit-by-commit. Part of rust-lang#127562
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#134181 (Tweak multispan rendering to reduce output length) - rust-lang#134209 (validate `--skip` and `--exclude` paths) - rust-lang#134231 (rustdoc-search: fix mismatched path when parent re-exported twice) - rust-lang#134236 (crashes: more tests v2) - rust-lang#134240 (Only dist `llvm-objcopy` if llvm tools are enabled) - rust-lang#134244 (rustc_borrowck: Stop suggesting the invalid syntax `&mut raw const`) - rust-lang#134251 (A bunch of cleanups (part 2)) - rust-lang#134256 (Use a more precise span in placeholder_type_error_diag) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#134244 - Enselic:no-mut-hint-for-raw-ref, r=jieyouxu rustc_borrowck: Stop suggesting the invalid syntax `&mut raw const` A legitimate suggestion would be to change from &raw const val to &raw mut val But until we have figured out how to make that happen we should at least stop suggesting invalid syntax. I recommend review commit-by-commit. Part of rust-lang#127562
jhpratt
added a commit
to jhpratt/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2024
rustc_borrowck: Suggest changing `&raw const` to `&raw mut` if applicable Closes rust-lang#127562 For reference, here is the diff compared to the original error reported in that issue before rust-lang#134244 stopped suggesting the invalid syntax: ``` diff --git a/tests/ui/borrowck/no-invalid-mut-suggestion-for-raw-pointer-issue-127562.stderr b/tests/ui/borrowck/no-invalid-mut-suggestion-for-raw-pointer-issue-127562.stderr index 0da5d15cf7f..dbe834b6b78 100644 --- a/tests/ui/borrowck/no-invalid-mut-suggestion-for-raw-pointer-issue-127562.stderr +++ b/tests/ui/borrowck/no-invalid-mut-suggestion-for-raw-pointer-issue-127562.stderr `@@` -6,8 +6,8 `@@` LL | unsafe { *ptr = 3; } | help: consider changing this to be a mutable pointer | -LL | let ptr = &mut raw const val; - | +++ +LL | let ptr = &raw mut val; + | ~~~ error: aborting due to 1 previous error ```
jhpratt
added a commit
to jhpratt/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2024
rustc_borrowck: Suggest changing `&raw const` to `&raw mut` if applicable Closes rust-lang#127562 For reference, here is the diff compared to the original error reported in that issue before rust-lang#134244 stopped suggesting the invalid syntax: ``` diff --git a/tests/ui/borrowck/no-invalid-mut-suggestion-for-raw-pointer-issue-127562.stderr b/tests/ui/borrowck/no-invalid-mut-suggestion-for-raw-pointer-issue-127562.stderr index 0da5d15cf7f..dbe834b6b78 100644 --- a/tests/ui/borrowck/no-invalid-mut-suggestion-for-raw-pointer-issue-127562.stderr +++ b/tests/ui/borrowck/no-invalid-mut-suggestion-for-raw-pointer-issue-127562.stderr ``@@`` -6,8 +6,8 ``@@`` LL | unsafe { *ptr = 3; } | help: consider changing this to be a mutable pointer | -LL | let ptr = &mut raw const val; - | +++ +LL | let ptr = &raw mut val; + | ~~~ error: aborting due to 1 previous error ```
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#134397 - Enselic:raw-mut, r=compiler-errors rustc_borrowck: Suggest changing `&raw const` to `&raw mut` if applicable Closes rust-lang#127562 For reference, here is the diff compared to the original error reported in that issue before rust-lang#134244 stopped suggesting the invalid syntax: ``` diff --git a/tests/ui/borrowck/no-invalid-mut-suggestion-for-raw-pointer-issue-127562.stderr b/tests/ui/borrowck/no-invalid-mut-suggestion-for-raw-pointer-issue-127562.stderr index 0da5d15cf7f..dbe834b6b78 100644 --- a/tests/ui/borrowck/no-invalid-mut-suggestion-for-raw-pointer-issue-127562.stderr +++ b/tests/ui/borrowck/no-invalid-mut-suggestion-for-raw-pointer-issue-127562.stderr ``@@`` -6,8 +6,8 ``@@`` LL | unsafe { *ptr = 3; } | help: consider changing this to be a mutable pointer | -LL | let ptr = &mut raw const val; - | +++ +LL | let ptr = &raw mut val; + | ~~~ error: aborting due to 1 previous error ```
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A legitimate suggestion would be to change from
to
But until we have figured out how to make that happen we should at least
stop suggesting invalid syntax.
I recommend review commit-by-commit.
Part of #127562