Rollup of 9 pull requests #128883
Merged
Rollup of 9 pull requests #128883
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Co-authored-by: lcnr <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Trevor Gross <[email protected]>
…ering assertion Issue: <rust-lang#128717>
Parser has error recovery for Unicode-confusables, which includes the right parentheses `)`. If a multi-byte right parentheses look-alike reaches the argument removal suggestion diagnostics, it would trigger an assertion because the diagnostics used `- BytePos(1)` which can land within a multi-byte codepoint. This is fixed by using `SourceMap::end_point` to find the final right delimiter codepoint, which correctly respects codepoint boundaries.
For codepoint boundary assertion triggered by a let stmt compound assignment removal suggestion when encountering recovered multi-byte compound ops. Issue: <rust-lang#128845>
…t codepoint boundaries Previously we would try to issue a suggestion for `let x <op>= 1`, i.e. a compound assignment within a `let` binding, to remove the `<op>`. The suggestion code unfortunately incorrectly assumed that the `<op>` is an exactly-1-byte ASCII character, but this assumption is incorrect because we also recover Unicode-confusables like `➖=` as `-=`. In this example, the suggestion code used a `+ BytePos(1)` to calculate the span of the `<op>` codepoint that looks like `-` but the mult-byte Unicode look-alike would cause the suggested removal span to be inside a multi-byte codepoint boundary, triggering a codepoint boundary assertion. Issue: <rust-lang#128845>
This will be useful for certain scenarios where developers want to know how the tarball sources were generated. We also want this to check for CI rustc incompatible options on bootstrap. Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <[email protected]>
Add `Steal::is_stolen()` Writers of rustc drivers (such as myself) often encounter stealing issues. It is currently impossible to gracefully handle them. This PR adds a `Steal::is_stolen()` function for that purpose.
VxWorks code refactored 1. Extern TaskNameSet as minimum supported version of os is VxWorks 7 which would have taskNameSet 2. Vx_TASK_NAME_LEN is 31 on VxWorks7, defined variable res. 3. Add unsafe blocks on Non::Zero usage in available_parallelism() 4. Update vxworks docs. r? `@tgross35` cc `@devnexen`
…balls, r=Kobzol add `builder-config` into tarball sources This will be useful for certain scenarios where developers want to know how the tarball sources were generated. We also want this to check for CI rustc incompatible options on bootstrap. Blocker for rust-lang#122709 r? Kobzol
…-not-rust, r=GuillaumeGomez rustdoc: do not run doctests with invalid langstrings rust-lang#124577 (comment) CC ``@decathorpe``
…able-sort, r=compiler-errors
use stable sort to sort multipart diagnostics
I think a stable sort should be used to sort the different parts of a multipart selection. The current unstable sort uses the text of the suggestion as a tie-breaker. That just doesn't seem right, and the order of the input is a better choice I think, because it gives the diagnostic author more control.
This came up when I was building a suggestion where
```rust
fn foo() {}
```
must be turned into an unsafe function, and an attribute must be added
```rust
#[target_feature(enable = "...")]
unsafe fn foo() {}
```
In this example, the two suggestions occur at the same position, but the order is extremely important: unsafe must come after the attribute. But the situation changes if there is a pub/pub(crate), and if the unsafe is already present. It just out that because of the suggestion text, there is no way for me to order the suggestions correctly.
This change probably should be tested, but are there tests of the diagnostics code itself in the tests?
r? ```@estebank```
Fix the name of signal 19 in library/std/src/sys/pal/unix/process/process_unix/tests.rs for mips/sparc linux relate to rust-lang#128816
Use `SourceMap::end_point` instead of `- BytePos(1)` in arg removal suggestion Previously, we tried to remove extra arg commas when providing extra arg removal suggestions. One of the edge cases is having to account for an arg that has a closing delimiter `)` following it. However, the previous suggestion code assumed that the delimiter is in fact exactly the 1-byte `)` character. This assumption was proven incorrect, because we recover from Unicode-confusable delimiters in the parser, which means that the ending delimiter could be a multi-byte codepoint that looks *like* a `)`. Subtracing 1 byte could land us in the middle of a codepoint, triggering a codepoint boundary assertion. This is fixed by using `SourceMap::end_point` which properly accounts for codepoint boundaries. Fixes rust-lang#128717. cc ````@fmease```` and rust-lang#128790
Ensure let stmt compound assignment removal suggestion respect codepoint boundaries Previously we would try to issue a suggestion for `let x <op>= 1`, i.e. a compound assignment within a `let` binding, to remove the `<op>`. The suggestion code unfortunately incorrectly assumed that the `<op>` is an exactly-1-byte ASCII character, but this assumption is incorrect because we also recover Unicode-confusables like `➖=` as `-=`. In this example, the suggestion code used a `+ BytePos(1)` to calculate the span of the `<op>` codepoint that looks like `-` but the mult-byte Unicode look-alike would cause the suggested removal span to be inside a multi-byte codepoint boundary, triggering a codepoint boundary assertion. The fix is to use `SourceMap::start_point(token_span)` which properly accounts for codepoint boundaries. Fixes rust-lang#128845. cc rust-lang#128790 r? ````@fmease````
…-ozkan Disable verbose bootstrap command failure logging by default One of my recent bootstrap command refactoring PRs enabled verbose logging of command failures by default. While this is great for debugging bootstrap, in many situations it's just too verbose and prevents the user from seeing the actual printed stdout/stderr, which usually contains much more useful information. This PR reverts that logic, and only prints a detailed error when `-v` is passed to bootstrap. r? ````@onur-ozkan````
rustbot
added
O-unix
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=9 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: 899eb03926 In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (19ebdce): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary -0.9%, secondary 3.0%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResults (secondary 2.4%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 759.636s -> 762.414s (0.37%) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
Steal::is_stolen()#128815 (AddSteal::is_stolen())builder-configinto tarball sources #128822 (addbuilder-configinto tarball sources)SourceMap::end_pointinstead of- BytePos(1)in arg removal suggestion #128864 (UseSourceMap::end_pointinstead of- BytePos(1)in arg removal suggestion)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup