Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

match lowering: Use an iterator to find expand_until #127707

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 16, 2024

Conversation

Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor

A small cleanup that I noticed while looking at #127164.

This makes it easier to see that the split point is always the index after the found item, or the whole list if no stopping point was found.

r? @Nadrieril

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 14, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 14, 2024

Some changes occurred in match lowering

cc @Nadrieril

// it.
// We can't expand or-patterns freely. The rule is:
// - If a candidate doesn't start with an or-pattern, we include it in
// the expansion list but don't expand it.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"but don't expand it" feels confusing to me given that there's nothing that we could expand. Maybe "we add it to the expansion list and it will be processed alongside the expanded or-patterns"

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, it's tricky to express what's happening here without being misleading/confusing. Hopefully the new wording is better.

This makes it easier to see that the split point is always the index after the
found item, or the whole list if no stopping point was found.
@Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated wording of comments (diff).

If you're still not sure about this, I can update the comment again to say less, in the interests of not holding up the underlying change too much.

@Nadrieril
Copy link
Member

Looks good, thank you!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 16, 2024

📌 Commit e37b92f has been approved by Nadrieril

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 16, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#127669 (Fix the issue of invalid suggestion for a reference of iterator)
 - rust-lang#127707 (match lowering: Use an iterator to find `expand_until`)
 - rust-lang#127730 (Fix and enforce `unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn` in compiler)
 - rust-lang#127789 (delete #![allow(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn)] in teeos)
 - rust-lang#127805 (run-make-support: update gimli to 0.31.0)
 - rust-lang#127808 (Make ErrorGuaranteed discoverable outside types, consts, and lifetimes)
 - rust-lang#127817 (Fix a bunch of sites that were walking instead of visiting, making it impossible for visitor impls to look at these values)
 - rust-lang#127818 (Various ast validation simplifications)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 7409a52 into rust-lang:master Jul 16, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.81.0 milestone Jul 16, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#127707 - Zalathar:expand-until, r=Nadrieril

match lowering: Use an iterator to find `expand_until`

A small cleanup that I noticed while looking at rust-lang#127164.

This makes it easier to see that the split point is always the index after the found item, or the whole list if no stopping point was found.

r? `@Nadrieril`
@Zalathar Zalathar deleted the expand-until branch July 16, 2024 23:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants