Migrate dylib-chain, rlib-chain, issue-47384, msvc-opt-minsize and test-harness run-make tests to ui/rmake

[Oneirical]

Part of #121876 and the associated Google Summer of Code project.

try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: aarch64-apple

[rustbot]

r? @jieyouxu

rustbot has assigned @jieyouxu.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

[rustbot]

This PR modifies tests/run-make/. If this PR is trying to port a Makefile
run-make test to use rmake.rs, please update the
run-make port tracking issue
so we can track our progress. You can either modify the tracking issue
directly, or you can comment on the tracking issue and link this PR.

cc @jieyouxu

[Kobzol]

r? @Kobzol

@bors try

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 2019f15 with merge 27ea1de...

[bors]

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

[Oneirical]

Ignore directive re-added with reason. @rustbot review

[Kobzol]

@rustbot author

[bors]

📌 Commit 35afb92 has been approved by Kobzol

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #127121) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

[Oneirical]

Did nothing except resolve merge conflict, please re-approve.

@rustbot review

[jieyouxu]

Cool

[jieyouxu]

@bors r=Kobzol,jieyouxu

[bors]

📌 Commit 45313a6 has been approved by Kobzol,jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 45313a6 with merge aa1d4f6...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Kobzol,jieyouxu
Pushing aa1d4f6 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (aa1d4f6): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 4.3%, secondary 2.3%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	4.3%	[2.0%, 6.5%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.3%	[1.4%, 3.5%]	10
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	4.3%	[2.0%, 6.5%]	2

Cycles

Results (secondary 0.3%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.5%	[0.4%, 0.6%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.4%	[-0.4%, -0.4%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 742.115s -> 724.291s (-2.40%)
Artifact size: 327.64 MiB -> 327.61 MiB (-0.01%)