Add a warning to proc_macro::Delimiter::None that rustc currently does not respect it. #124389
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
rustbot has assigned @petrochenkov. Use |
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
petrochenkov
added
S-waiting-on-author
ijackson
reviewed
May 10, 2024
…t it. It does not provide the behaviour it is indicated to provide when used in a proc_macro context.
|
I have updated the commit with the given suggestions. |
|
@rustbot ready |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2024
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#122382 (Detect unused structs which implement private traits) - rust-lang#124389 (Add a warning to proc_macro::Delimiter::None that rustc currently does not respect it.) - rust-lang#125224 (Migrate `run-make/issue-53964` to `rmake`) - rust-lang#125227 (Migrate `run-make/issue-30063` to `rmake`) - rust-lang#125336 (Add dedicated definition for intrinsics) - rust-lang#125401 (Migrate `run-make/rustdoc-scrape-examples-macros` to `rmake.rs`) - rust-lang#125454 (Improve the doc of query associated_item) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#124389 - CensoredUsername:master, r=petrochenkov Add a warning to proc_macro::Delimiter::None that rustc currently does not respect it. It does not provide the behaviour it is indicated to provide when used in a proc_macro context. This seems to be a bug, (rust-lang#67062), but it is a long standing one, and hard to discover. This pull request adds a warning to inform users of this issue, with a link to the relevant issue, and a version number of the last known affected rustc version.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It does not provide the behaviour it is indicated to provide when used in a proc_macro context.
This seems to be a bug, (#67062), but it is a long standing one, and hard to discover.
This pull request adds a warning to inform users of this issue, with a link to the relevant issue, and a version number of the last known affected rustc version.