Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation fix #123595

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2024
Merged

Documentation fix #123595

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2024

Conversation

balaganesh102004
Copy link
Contributor

Changed "It must not be an identical residual when interconversion is involved" to "The residual is not mandated to be identical when interconversion is involved." as the previous parenthetical appears to state that the residual is not permitted to be identical when interconversion is involved. However the intention of the original wording was to convey that the residual is not required to be identical when interconversion is involved, which makes more sense contextually.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 7, 2024

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @joboet (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 7, 2024
@joboet
Copy link
Member

joboet commented Apr 8, 2024

Oh yes, that's much better. Thank you!
@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 8, 2024

📌 Commit 8f6ebf6 has been approved by joboet

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 8, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#115984 (extending filesystem support for Hermit)
 - rust-lang#120144 (privacy: Stabilize lint `unnameable_types`)
 - rust-lang#122807 (Add consistency with phrases "meantime" and "mean time")
 - rust-lang#123089 (Add invariant to VecDeque::pop_* that len < cap if pop successful)
 - rust-lang#123595 (Documentation fix)
 - rust-lang#123625 (Stop exporting `TypeckRootCtxt` and `FnCtxt`.)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 5c3559d into rust-lang:master Apr 8, 2024
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.79.0 milestone Apr 8, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#123595 - balaganesh102004:master, r=joboet

Documentation fix

Changed "It must not be an identical residual when interconversion is involved" to "The residual is not mandated to be identical when interconversion is involved." as the previous parenthetical appears to state that the residual is not permitted to be identical when interconversion is involved. However the intention of the original wording was to convey that the residual is not required to be identical when interconversion is involved, which makes more sense contextually.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants