Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

deduplicate infer var instantiation #121211

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

lcnr
Copy link
Contributor

@lcnr lcnr commented Feb 17, 2024

Having 3 separate implementations of one of the most subtle parts of our type system is not a good strategy if we want to maintain a sound type system ✨ while working on this I already found some subtle bugs in the existing code, so that's awesome 🎉 cc #121159

This was necessary as I am not confident in my nll changes in #119106, so I am first cleaning this up in a separate PR.

r? @BoxyUwU

lcnr added 4 commits February 17, 2024 00:25
we already use `instantiate_const_var`. This does lose some debugging
info for nll because we stop populating the `reg_var_to_origin` table with
`RegionCtxt::Existential(None)`, I don't think that matters however.
Supporting this adds additional complexity to one of the most involved
parts of the type system, so I really don't think it's worth it.
@lcnr
Copy link
Contributor Author

lcnr commented Feb 17, 2024

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 17, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 17, 2024

Type relation code was changed

cc @compiler-errors, @lcnr

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Feb 17, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 17, 2024

⌛ Trying commit fea82c9 with merge 06e5b65...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2024
deduplicate infer var instantiation

Having 3 separate implementations of one of the most subtle parts of our type system is not a good strategy if we want to maintain a sound type system ✨ while working on this I already found some subtle bugs in the existing code, so that's awesome 🎉

This was necessary as I am not confident in my nll changes in rust-lang#119106, so I am first cleaning this up in a separate PR.

r? `@BoxyUwU`
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@lcnr lcnr force-pushed the nll-relate-handle-infer branch from fea82c9 to 54b3c87 Compare February 17, 2024 01:56
@BoxyUwU
Copy link
Member

BoxyUwU commented Feb 19, 2024

@bors r+ rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 19, 2024

📌 Commit 54b3c87 has been approved by BoxyUwU

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 19, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 19, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 54b3c87 with merge 0395fa3...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 20, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: BoxyUwU
Pushing 0395fa3 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Feb 20, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 0395fa3 into rust-lang:master Feb 20, 2024
12 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.78.0 milestone Feb 20, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (0395fa3): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
3.9% [3.9%, 3.9%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.8% [-2.8%, -2.8%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -2.8% [-2.8%, -2.8%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 639.676s -> 639.836s (0.03%)
Artifact size: 308.81 MiB -> 308.66 MiB (-0.05%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants