Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: mention round-to-even in precision formatting #120967

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 13, 2024
Merged

docs: mention round-to-even in precision formatting #120967

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 13, 2024

Conversation

LeoDog896
Copy link
Contributor

Note: Not quite sure exactly how to format this documentation.

Mentions round-to-even usage in precision formatting. (should this also be mentioned in f64::round?)

From #70336

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 12, 2024

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @cuviper (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 12, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

library/alloc/src/fmt.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@cuviper
Copy link
Member

cuviper commented Feb 13, 2024

Thanks!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 13, 2024

📌 Commit 0f53e72 has been approved by cuviper

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 13, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#120696 (Properly handle `async` block and `async fn` in `if` exprs without `else`)
 - rust-lang#120751 (Provide more suggestions on invalid equality where bounds)
 - rust-lang#120802 (Bail out of drop elaboration when encountering error types)
 - rust-lang#120967 (docs: mention round-to-even in precision formatting)
 - rust-lang#120973 (allow static_mut_ref in some tests that specifically test mutable statics)
 - rust-lang#120974 (llvm-wrapper: adapt for LLVM API change: Add support for EXPORTAS name types)
 - rust-lang#120986 (iterator.rs: remove "Basic usage" text)
 - rust-lang#120987 (remove redundant logic)
 - rust-lang#120988 (fix comment)
 - rust-lang#120995 (PassWrapper: adapt for llvm/llvm-project@93cdd1b5cfa3735c)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 134de26 into rust-lang:master Feb 13, 2024
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.78.0 milestone Feb 13, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#120967 - LeoDog896:master, r=cuviper

docs: mention round-to-even in precision formatting

_Note_: Not quite sure exactly how to format this documentation.

Mentions round-to-even usage in precision formatting. (should this also be mentioned in `f64::round`?)

From rust-lang#70336
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants