Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Name explicit registers in conflict register errors for inline assembly #117912

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 2, 2023

Conversation

GeorgeWort
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 14, 2023

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @petrochenkov (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 14, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

Some more tests in tests/ui/asm also need an update.
@rustbot author

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 17, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

r=me with the style nit addressed #117912 (comment)

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 28, 2023

📌 Commit e0bfb61 has been approved by petrochenkov

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Nov 28, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2023
Name explicit registers in conflict register errors for inline assembly
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2023
Name explicit registers in conflict register errors for inline assembly
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 29, 2023

⌛ Testing commit e0bfb61 with merge 5f0ff7c...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2023
Name explicit registers in conflict register errors for inline assembly
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 29, 2023

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Nov 29, 2023
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors retry

@bors bors removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 29, 2023
@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 29, 2023
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

(CI appears to be down in general.)

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 29, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 29, 2023

⌛ Testing commit e0bfb61 with merge fce2c02...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2023
Name explicit registers in conflict register errors for inline assembly
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 29, 2023

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Nov 29, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 29, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 30, 2023

⌛ Testing commit e0bfb61 with merge 3a19e68...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2023
Name explicit registers in conflict register errors for inline assembly
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 30, 2023

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Nov 30, 2023
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 2, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 2, 2023

⌛ Testing commit e0bfb61 with merge 4e3dc97...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 2, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: petrochenkov
Pushing 4e3dc97 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 2, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 4e3dc97 into rust-lang:master Dec 2, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.76.0 milestone Dec 2, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (4e3dc97): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.6% [2.5%, 2.6%] 2
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.7% [2.7%, 2.7%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.5% [-3.5%, -3.5%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.6% [2.5%, 2.6%] 2

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 671.874s -> 673.421s (0.23%)
Artifact size: 313.92 MiB -> 313.90 MiB (-0.01%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants