Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix a couple ICEs in the new
CastKind::Transmute
code #110021Fix a couple ICEs in the new
CastKind::Transmute
code #110021Changes from all commits
454bca5
d757c4b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this check necessary?
For pairs you need to check the inner size because matching size of the whole pair doesn't necessarily imply matching sizes of elements... But surely the
operand.layout.size != cast.size
check is sufficient for scalars? 🤔There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, good call. Let me give that a shot -- might allow deleting more code too...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed this check, but
ScalarOrZst::size
is still needed elsewhere, so I couldn't remove more than that.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, no, vectors. Without this check
<4 x i64>
to<8 x f32>
trips the later debug-assert.I suppose I could hypothetically
bitcast
that anyway, but I'm not doing that this PR.Added some codegen tests for vectors so that when future me breaks this while running
--keep-stage-std
again, I'll notice without CI 😬