Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove incorrect comment in Vec::drain #103359

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 22, 2022

Conversation

WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member

r? @scottmcm

Turns out this comment wasn't correct for 6 years, since #34951, which switched from using slice::IterMut into using slice::Iter.

@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Oct 21, 2022
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 21, 2022

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 21, 2022
@scottmcm
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 21, 2022

📌 Commit e97d295 has been approved by scottmcm

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 21, 2022
notriddle added a commit to notriddle/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2022
…cottmcm

Remove incorrect comment in `Vec::drain`

r? `@scottmcm`

Turns out this comment wasn't correct for 6 years, since rust-lang#34951, which switched from using `slice::IterMut` into using `slice::Iter`.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2022
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#102635 (make `order_dependent_trait_objects` show up in future-breakage reports)
 - rust-lang#103335 (Replaced wrong test with the correct mcve)
 - rust-lang#103339 (Fix some typos)
 - rust-lang#103340 (WinConsole::new is not actually fallible)
 - rust-lang#103341 (Add test for issue 97607)
 - rust-lang#103351 (Require Drop impls to have the same constness on its bounds as the bounds on the struct have)
 - rust-lang#103359 (Remove incorrect comment in `Vec::drain`)
 - rust-lang#103364 (rustdoc: clean up rustdoc-toggle CSS)
 - rust-lang#103370 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS `.out-of-band { font-weight: normal }`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 1b2f594 into rust-lang:master Oct 22, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.66.0 milestone Oct 22, 2022
@WaffleLapkin WaffleLapkin deleted the drain_no_mut_qqq branch October 22, 2022 19:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants