-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make use of [wrapping_]byte_{add,sub}
#100819
Conversation
Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams! If this PR contains changes to any Examples of
|
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ macro_rules! iterator { | |||
// backwards by `n`. `n` must not exceed `self.len()`. | |||
macro_rules! zst_shrink { | |||
($self: ident, $n: ident) => { | |||
$self.end = ($self.end as * $raw_mut u8).wrapping_offset(-$n) as * $raw_mut T; | |||
$self.end = $self.end.wrapping_byte_offset(-$n); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change is fine, but I definitely look at it and wonder if it can be
$self.end = $self.end.wrapping_byte_offset(-$n); | |
$self.end = $self.end.wrapping_byte_sub($n); |
since it's explicitly shrink
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I haven't done this originally because ($n): isize
, but I've just checked and it seems that this is only called with literals and smt as isize
so this change makes sense.
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit b2326ae96398eb936351a7364dc9526730f4814a has been approved by It is now in the queue for this repository. |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #100881) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
...replacing `.cast().wrapping_offset().cast()` & similar code.
b2326ae
to
53565b2
Compare
rebased to make merge conflicts go away |
@bors r+ |
… r=scottmcm Make use of `[wrapping_]byte_{add,sub}` These new methods trivially replace old `.cast().wrapping_offset().cast()` & similar code. Note that [`arith_offset`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/intrinsics/fn.arith_offset.html) and `wrapping_offset` are the same thing. r? `@scottmcm` _split off from #100746_
… r=scottmcm Make use of `[wrapping_]byte_{add,sub}` These new methods trivially replace old `.cast().wrapping_offset().cast()` & similar code. Note that [`arith_offset`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/intrinsics/fn.arith_offset.html) and `wrapping_offset` are the same thing. r? ``@scottmcm`` _split off from #100746_
… r=scottmcm Make use of `[wrapping_]byte_{add,sub}` These new methods trivially replace old `.cast().wrapping_offset().cast()` & similar code. Note that [`arith_offset`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/intrinsics/fn.arith_offset.html) and `wrapping_offset` are the same thing. r? ```@scottmcm``` _split off from #100746_
@bors rollup=iffy #100947 (comment) |
Can this PR be un- |
@bors rollup=maybe |
… r=scottmcm Make use of `[wrapping_]byte_{add,sub}` These new methods trivially replace old `.cast().wrapping_offset().cast()` & similar code. Note that [`arith_offset`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/intrinsics/fn.arith_offset.html) and `wrapping_offset` are the same thing. r? `@scottmcm` _split off from #100746_
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#98304 (Add MaybeUninit memset test) - rust-lang#98801 (Add a `File::create_new` constructor) - rust-lang#99821 (Remove separate indexing of early-bound regions) - rust-lang#100239 (remove an ineffective check in const_prop) - rust-lang#100337 (Stabilize `std::io::read_to_string`) - rust-lang#100819 (Make use of `[wrapping_]byte_{add,sub}`) - rust-lang#100934 (Remove a panicking branch from `fmt::builders::PadAdapter`) - rust-lang#101000 (Separate CountIsStar from CountIsParam in rustc_parse_format.) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
self.end = unsafe { arith_offset(self.end as *const i8, -1) as *mut T }; | ||
self.end = self.ptr.wrapping_byte_sub(1); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this right? It's using self.ptr
instead of self.end
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed this is wrong; should be fixed by #101237.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm sorry 🥲
I think there's a bug in this PR -- see #101235. |
fix into_iter on ZST Fixes rust-lang#101235 Thanks to `@ChrisDenton` for [spotting the problem](rust-lang#100819 (review)).
…leftovers, r=scottmcm Some more cleanup in `core` - remove some integer casts from slice iter (proposed in rust-lang#100819 (comment)) - replace `as usize` casts with `usize::from` in slice sort (proposed in rust-lang#100822 (comment)) r? `@scottmcm`
fix into_iter on ZST Fixes rust-lang/rust#101235 Thanks to `@ChrisDenton` for [spotting the problem](rust-lang/rust#100819 (review)).
…, r=scottmcm Some more cleanup in `core` - remove some integer casts from slice iter (proposed in rust-lang/rust#100819 (comment)) - replace `as usize` casts with `usize::from` in slice sort (proposed in rust-lang/rust#100822 (comment)) r? `@scottmcm`
These new methods trivially replace old
.cast().wrapping_offset().cast()
& similar code.Note that
arith_offset
andwrapping_offset
are the same thing.r? @scottmcm
split off from #100746