You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When a set of builds/tests pass, bors appears to explicitly close the corresponding pull-request. Is there a reason to do this? If it didn’t, GitHub would automatically mark the PR as "Merged" (which is nicer than "Closed") when bors merges into master and the commit ends up in HEAD’s ancestry.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Fix `unused_peekable` closure and `f(&mut peekable)` false positives
changelog: Fix [`unused_peekable`] false positive when peeked in a closure or called as `f(&mut peekable)`
The `return`/`break` changes aren't part of the fix, they allow an earlier return in some cases. `break` is replaced with `return` for style purposes as they do the same thing in this case
Fixesrust-lang#9456Fixesrust-lang#9462
When a set of builds/tests pass, bors appears to explicitly close the corresponding pull-request. Is there a reason to do this? If it didn’t, GitHub would automatically mark the PR as "Merged" (which is nicer than "Closed") when bors merges into master and the commit ends up in HEAD’s ancestry.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: