-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ICE related to lifetimes and traits #58451
Comments
cc @rust-lang/wg-traits |
Backtrace:
|
Bug was introduced between ec19464...c0bbc39 (nightly-2019-01-02 and nightly-2019-01-03). Based on the commits that day @nikomatsakis |
visit for triage. P-high. Presumably due to PR #55517. Assigning to @nikomatsakis |
[WIP] Re-implement leak check in terms of universes This PR temporarily restores the leak-check, but implemented in terms of universes. This is not because the leak check behavior was necessarily **correct**, but because (a) we may want to have a transition period and because (b) we want to have more breathing room to work through the full implications of handling higher-ranked types correctly. Note that this PR builds atop #58056. Fixes #58451 Fixes #46989 Fixes #57639 r? @aturon cc @arielb1, @lqd ~~Temporary note: I've not finished running `./x.py test` locally -- I'm confident a lot of error messages in tests will need updating. I sort of expect them to revert to the older, (imo) less good error messages, which is mildly unfortunate. There might be a way to preserve the new error messages, not sure.~~
While it appears this will be fixed by #58592, I also have a WIP fix we'd be able to use when/if the leak check is removed again. (It's currently ad-hoc but I will work to generalize it). (WIP updates were tracked in this zulip topic) |
Re-implement leak check in terms of universes This PR temporarily restores the leak-check, but implemented in terms of universes. This is not because the leak check behavior was necessarily **correct**, but because (a) we may want to have a transition period and because (b) we want to have more breathing room to work through the full implications of handling higher-ranked types correctly. Note that this PR builds atop #58056. Fixes #58451 Fixes #46989 Fixes #57639 r? @aturon cc @arielb1, @lqd ~~Temporary note: I've not finished running `./x.py test` locally -- I'm confident a lot of error messages in tests will need updating. I sort of expect them to revert to the older, (imo) less good error messages, which is mildly unfortunate. There might be a way to preserve the new error messages, not sure.~~
Works fine one stable. ICE on beta and nightly. I couldn't reduce or generalize this error any more than this. It appears to be triggered by some unknown type; notice the inner
f()
has no argument here, it could be any type that doesn't meet the bounds.Playground
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: