-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implicitly copyable iterators are mega confusing #18045
Comments
In a garbage collected language, adaptors would always take the wrapped iterator by-reference. It makes more sense that way, but it doesn't work well in Rust. Rust's iterator adaptors need to be able to take the wrapped iterator by-value, and the natural way to deal with it is only having by-value adaptors and then taking advantage of references being values ( |
I think it would be wrong to avoid |
Sure, I agree with all that. I just think there's a usability / confusion issue here that we need to resolve. Opt-in |
Hm, I hadn't thought about putting these iterators in |
cc @aturon |
@kmcallister: It would end up causing warnings for typical iterator chains. I never liked that I had to use by-value for the parameters but I don't really see an alternative. |
@kmcallister Opt-in I think that PR probably makes everything in |
@aturon: It doesn't address the problem. It would be incorrect to leave out of a |
It's hardly an issue specific to iterator types anyway... |
This code still acts the same today, even after opt-in |
As per [RFC rust-lang#235][rfc], you can now do: [rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0235-collections-conventions.md#intoiterator-and-iterable ``` rust let mut v = vec![1]; // iterate over immutable references for x in &v { assert_eq!(x, &1); } // iterate over mutable references for x in &mut v { assert_eq!(x, &mut 1); } // iterate over values, this consumes `v` for x in v { assert_eq!(x, 1); } ``` [breaking-change]s For loops now "consume" (move) the iterator, this breaks iterating over mutable references to iterators, and also breaks multiple iterations over the same iterator: ``` rust fn foo(mut it: &mut Iter) { // `Iter` implements `Iterator` for x in it { .. } //~ error: `&mut Iter` doesn't implement Iterator } fn bar() { for x in it { .. } //~ note: `it` moved here for x in it { .. } //~ error: `it` has been moved } ``` Both cases can be fixed using the `by_ref()` adapter to create an iterator from the mutable reference: ``` rust fn foo(mut it: &mut Iter) { for x in it.by_ref() { .. } } fn bar() { for x in it.by_ref() { .. } for x in it { .. } } ``` This PR also makes iterator non-implicitly copyable, as this was source of subtle bugs in the libraries. You can still use `clone()` to explictly copy the iterator. Finally, since the for loops are implemented in the frontend and use global paths to `IntoIterator`, `Iterator` and `Option` variants, users of the `core` crate will have to use add an `std` module to the root of their crate to be able to use for loops: ``` rust #![no_std] extern crate core; fn main() { for x in 0..10 {} } #[doc(hidden)] mod std { // these imports are needed to use for-loops pub use core::iter; pub use core::option; } ``` --- r? @nikomatsakis @aturon cc rust-lang#18424 closes rust-lang#18045
fix: Fix lowering of for loops dropping the loop block
For example, this code:
compiles and prints
Hel
ten times, rather than the expectedHel
,lo,
,wo
, etc.The fact that
stream
isn'tmut
is a clue that this code doesn't work as expected.I guess the solution is
stream.as_ref().take(3)
but the "default" behavior here is really confusing.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: