Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Instantiate constness in wfcheck
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
fee1-dead committed Jul 24, 2022
1 parent 05bb26f commit 6660227
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 46 additions and 10 deletions.
43 changes: 35 additions & 8 deletions compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/wf.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ pub fn trait_obligations<'a, 'tcx>(
infcx: &InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx>,
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
body_id: hir::HirId,
trait_ref: &ty::TraitRef<'tcx>,
trait_pred: &ty::TraitPredicate<'tcx>,
span: Span,
item: &'tcx hir::Item<'tcx>,
) -> Vec<traits::PredicateObligation<'tcx>> {
Expand All @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ pub fn trait_obligations<'a, 'tcx>(
recursion_depth: 0,
item: Some(item),
};
wf.compute_trait_ref(trait_ref, Elaborate::All);
wf.compute_trait_pred(trait_pred, Elaborate::All);
debug!(obligations = ?wf.out);
wf.normalize(infcx)
}
Expand All @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ pub fn predicate_obligations<'a, 'tcx>(
// It's ok to skip the binder here because wf code is prepared for it
match predicate.kind().skip_binder() {
ty::PredicateKind::Trait(t) => {
wf.compute_trait_ref(&t.trait_ref, Elaborate::None);
wf.compute_trait_pred(&t, Elaborate::None);
}
ty::PredicateKind::RegionOutlives(..) => {}
ty::PredicateKind::TypeOutlives(ty::OutlivesPredicate(ty, _reg)) => {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -301,11 +301,18 @@ impl<'tcx> WfPredicates<'tcx> {
}

/// Pushes the obligations required for `trait_ref` to be WF into `self.out`.
fn compute_trait_ref(&mut self, trait_ref: &ty::TraitRef<'tcx>, elaborate: Elaborate) {
fn compute_trait_pred(&mut self, trait_pred: &ty::TraitPredicate<'tcx>, elaborate: Elaborate) {
let tcx = self.tcx;
let obligations = self.nominal_obligations(trait_ref.def_id, trait_ref.substs);
let trait_ref = &trait_pred.trait_ref;

debug!("compute_trait_ref obligations {:?}", obligations);
// if the trait predicate is not const, the wf obligations should not be const as well.
let obligations = if trait_pred.constness == ty::BoundConstness::NotConst {
self.nominal_obligations_without_const(trait_ref.def_id, trait_ref.substs)
} else {
self.nominal_obligations(trait_ref.def_id, trait_ref.substs)
};

debug!("compute_trait_pred obligations {:?}", obligations);
let param_env = self.param_env;
let depth = self.recursion_depth;

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -685,10 +692,11 @@ impl<'tcx> WfPredicates<'tcx> {
}

#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self))]
fn nominal_obligations(
fn nominal_obligations_inner(
&mut self,
def_id: DefId,
substs: SubstsRef<'tcx>,
remap_constness: bool,
) -> Vec<traits::PredicateObligation<'tcx>> {
let predicates = self.tcx.predicates_of(def_id);
let mut origins = vec![def_id; predicates.predicates.len()];
Expand All @@ -703,19 +711,38 @@ impl<'tcx> WfPredicates<'tcx> {
debug_assert_eq!(predicates.predicates.len(), origins.len());

iter::zip(iter::zip(predicates.predicates, predicates.spans), origins.into_iter().rev())
.map(|((pred, span), origin_def_id)| {
.map(|((mut pred, span), origin_def_id)| {
let code = if span.is_dummy() {
traits::MiscObligation
} else {
traits::BindingObligation(origin_def_id, span)
};
let cause = self.cause(code);
if remap_constness {
pred = pred.without_const(self.tcx);
}
traits::Obligation::with_depth(cause, self.recursion_depth, self.param_env, pred)
})
.filter(|pred| !pred.has_escaping_bound_vars())
.collect()
}

fn nominal_obligations(
&mut self,
def_id: DefId,
substs: SubstsRef<'tcx>,
) -> Vec<traits::PredicateObligation<'tcx>> {
self.nominal_obligations_inner(def_id, substs, false)
}

fn nominal_obligations_without_const(
&mut self,
def_id: DefId,
substs: SubstsRef<'tcx>,
) -> Vec<traits::PredicateObligation<'tcx>> {
self.nominal_obligations_inner(def_id, substs, true)
}

fn from_object_ty(
&mut self,
ty: Ty<'tcx>,
Expand Down
13 changes: 11 additions & 2 deletions compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/wfcheck.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ fn check_item<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, item: &'tcx hir::Item<'tcx>) {
// We match on both `ty::ImplPolarity` and `ast::ImplPolarity` just to get the `!` span.
match (tcx.impl_polarity(def_id), impl_.polarity) {
(ty::ImplPolarity::Positive, _) => {
check_impl(tcx, item, impl_.self_ty, &impl_.of_trait);
check_impl(tcx, item, impl_.self_ty, &impl_.of_trait, impl_.constness);
}
(ty::ImplPolarity::Negative, ast::ImplPolarity::Negative(span)) => {
// FIXME(#27579): what amount of WF checking do we need for neg impls?
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1242,6 +1242,7 @@ fn check_impl<'tcx>(
item: &'tcx hir::Item<'tcx>,
ast_self_ty: &hir::Ty<'_>,
ast_trait_ref: &Option<hir::TraitRef<'_>>,
constness: hir::Constness,
) {
enter_wf_checking_ctxt(tcx, item.span, item.def_id, |wfcx| {
match *ast_trait_ref {
Expand All @@ -1251,11 +1252,19 @@ fn check_impl<'tcx>(
// won't hold).
let trait_ref = tcx.impl_trait_ref(item.def_id).unwrap();
let trait_ref = wfcx.normalize(ast_trait_ref.path.span, None, trait_ref);
let trait_pred = ty::TraitPredicate {
trait_ref,
constness: match constness {
hir::Constness::Const => ty::BoundConstness::ConstIfConst,
hir::Constness::NotConst => ty::BoundConstness::NotConst,
},
polarity: ty::ImplPolarity::Positive,
};
let obligations = traits::wf::trait_obligations(
wfcx.infcx,
wfcx.param_env,
wfcx.body_id,
&trait_ref,
&trait_pred,
ast_trait_ref.path.span,
item,
);
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 6660227

Please sign in to comment.