Rollup merge of #125754 - Zalathar:conditions-num, r=lqd

coverage: Rename MC/DC `conditions_num` to `num_conditions`

Updated version of #124571, without the other changes that were split out into #125108 and #125700.

This value represents a quantity of conditions, not an ID, so the new spelling is more appropriate.

Some of the code touched by this PR could perhaps use some other changes, but I would prefer to keep this PR as a simple renaming and avoid scope creep.

`@rustbot` label +A-code-coverage

compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/coverageinfo/ffi.rs

@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ pub mod mcdc {
     #[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Default)]
     pub struct DecisionParameters {
         bitmap_idx: u32,
-        conditions_num: u16,
+        num_conditions: u16,
     }
 
     // ConditionId in llvm is `unsigned int` at 18 while `int16_t` at [19](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81257)
@@ -177,8 +177,9 @@ pub mod mcdc {
     }
 
     impl From<DecisionInfo> for DecisionParameters {
-        fn from(value: DecisionInfo) -> Self {
-            Self { bitmap_idx: value.bitmap_idx, conditions_num: value.conditions_num }
+        fn from(info: DecisionInfo) -> Self {
+            let DecisionInfo { bitmap_idx, num_conditions } = info;
+            Self { bitmap_idx, num_conditions }
         }
     }
 }

compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/coverage.rs

@@ -329,14 +329,14 @@ pub struct MCDCBranchSpan {
 #[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
 pub struct DecisionInfo {
     pub bitmap_idx: u32,
-    pub conditions_num: u16,
+    pub num_conditions: u16,
 }
 
 #[derive(Clone, Debug)]
 #[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
 pub struct MCDCDecisionSpan {
     pub span: Span,
-    pub conditions_num: usize,
+    pub num_conditions: usize,
     pub end_markers: Vec<BlockMarkerId>,
     pub decision_depth: u16,
 }

compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/pretty.rs

@@ -512,12 +512,12 @@ fn write_coverage_branch_info(
         )?;
     }
 
-    for coverage::MCDCDecisionSpan { span, conditions_num, end_markers, decision_depth } in
+    for coverage::MCDCDecisionSpan { span, num_conditions, end_markers, decision_depth } in
         mcdc_decision_spans
     {
         writeln!(
             w,
-            "{INDENT}coverage mcdc decision {{ conditions_num: {conditions_num:?}, end: {end_markers:?}, depth: {decision_depth:?} }} => {span:?}"
+            "{INDENT}coverage mcdc decision {{ num_conditions: {num_conditions:?}, end: {end_markers:?}, depth: {decision_depth:?} }} => {span:?}"
         )?;
     }
 

compiler/rustc_mir_build/messages.ftl

@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ mir_build_deref_raw_pointer_requires_unsafe_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_allowed =
     .note = raw pointers may be null, dangling or unaligned; they can violate aliasing rules and cause data races: all of these are undefined behavior
     .label = dereference of raw pointer
 
-mir_build_exceeds_mcdc_condition_num_limit =  Conditions number of the decision ({$conditions_num}) exceeds limit ({$max_conditions_num}). MCDC analysis will not count this expression.
+mir_build_exceeds_mcdc_condition_limit = Number of conditions in decision ({$num_conditions}) exceeds limit ({$max_conditions}). MC/DC analysis will not count this expression.
 
 mir_build_extern_static_requires_unsafe =
     use of extern static is unsafe and requires unsafe block

compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/coverageinfo/mcdc.rs

@@ -10,12 +10,12 @@ use rustc_middle::ty::TyCtxt;
 use rustc_span::Span;
 
 use crate::build::Builder;
-use crate::errors::MCDCExceedsConditionNumLimit;
+use crate::errors::MCDCExceedsConditionLimit;
 
 /// The MCDC bitmap scales exponentially (2^n) based on the number of conditions seen,
 /// So llvm sets a maximum value prevents the bitmap footprint from growing too large without the user's knowledge.
 /// This limit may be relaxed if the [upstream change](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82448) is merged.
-const MAX_CONDITIONS_NUM_IN_DECISION: usize = 6;
+const MAX_CONDITIONS_IN_DECISION: usize = 6;
 
 #[derive(Default)]
 struct MCDCDecisionCtx {
@@ -100,22 +100,22 @@ impl MCDCState {
             }
             None => decision_ctx.processing_decision.insert(MCDCDecisionSpan {
                 span,
-                conditions_num: 0,
+                num_conditions: 0,
                 end_markers: vec![],
                 decision_depth,
             }),
         };
 
         let parent_condition = decision_ctx.decision_stack.pop_back().unwrap_or_default();
         let lhs_id = if parent_condition.condition_id == ConditionId::NONE {
-            decision.conditions_num += 1;
-            ConditionId::from(decision.conditions_num)
+            decision.num_conditions += 1;
+            ConditionId::from(decision.num_conditions)
         } else {
             parent_condition.condition_id
         };
 
-        decision.conditions_num += 1;
-        let rhs_condition_id = ConditionId::from(decision.conditions_num);
+        decision.num_conditions += 1;
+        let rhs_condition_id = ConditionId::from(decision.num_conditions);
 
         let (lhs, rhs) = match op {
             LogicalOp::And => {
@@ -208,28 +208,28 @@ impl MCDCInfoBuilder {
         // is empty, i.e. when all the conditions of the decision were instrumented,
         // and the decision is "complete".
         if let Some(decision) = decision_result {
-            match decision.conditions_num {
+            match decision.num_conditions {
                 0 => {
                     unreachable!("Decision with no condition is not expected");
                 }
-                1..=MAX_CONDITIONS_NUM_IN_DECISION => {
+                1..=MAX_CONDITIONS_IN_DECISION => {
                     self.decision_spans.push(decision);
                 }
                 _ => {
                     // Do not generate mcdc mappings and statements for decisions with too many conditions.
                     // Therefore, first erase the condition info of the (N-1) previous branch spans.
-                    let rebase_idx = self.branch_spans.len() - (decision.conditions_num - 1);
+                    let rebase_idx = self.branch_spans.len() - (decision.num_conditions - 1);
                     for branch in &mut self.branch_spans[rebase_idx..] {
                         branch.condition_info = None;
                     }
 
                     // Then, erase this last branch span's info too, for a total of N.
                     condition_info = None;
 
-                    tcx.dcx().emit_warn(MCDCExceedsConditionNumLimit {
+                    tcx.dcx().emit_warn(MCDCExceedsConditionLimit {
                         span: decision.span,
-                        conditions_num: decision.conditions_num,
-                        max_conditions_num: MAX_CONDITIONS_NUM_IN_DECISION,
+                        num_conditions: decision.num_conditions,
+                        max_conditions: MAX_CONDITIONS_IN_DECISION,
                     });
                 }
             }

compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/errors.rs

@@ -812,12 +812,12 @@ pub struct NonEmptyNeverPattern<'tcx> {
 }
 
 #[derive(Diagnostic)]
-#[diag(mir_build_exceeds_mcdc_condition_num_limit)]
-pub(crate) struct MCDCExceedsConditionNumLimit {
+#[diag(mir_build_exceeds_mcdc_condition_limit)]
+pub(crate) struct MCDCExceedsConditionLimit {
     #[primary_span]
     pub span: Span,
-    pub conditions_num: usize,
-    pub max_conditions_num: usize,
+    pub num_conditions: usize,
+    pub max_conditions: usize,
 }
 
 #[derive(Diagnostic)]

compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/coverage/mappings.rs

@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ pub(super) struct MCDCDecision {
     pub(super) span: Span,
     pub(super) end_bcbs: BTreeSet<BasicCoverageBlock>,
     pub(super) bitmap_idx: u32,
-    pub(super) conditions_num: u16,
+    pub(super) num_conditions: u16,
     pub(super) decision_depth: u16,
 }
 
@@ -268,13 +268,13 @@ pub(super) fn extract_mcdc_mappings(
             // the bitmap, rounded up to a whole number of bytes.
             // The decision's "bitmap index" points to its first byte in the bitmap.
             let bitmap_idx = *mcdc_bitmap_bytes;
-            *mcdc_bitmap_bytes += (1_u32 << decision.conditions_num).div_ceil(8);
+            *mcdc_bitmap_bytes += (1_u32 << decision.num_conditions).div_ceil(8);
 
             Some(MCDCDecision {
                 span,
                 end_bcbs,
                 bitmap_idx,
-                conditions_num: decision.conditions_num as u16,
+                num_conditions: decision.num_conditions as u16,
                 decision_depth: decision.decision_depth,
             })
         },

compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/coverage/mod.rs

@@ -195,9 +195,9 @@ fn create_mappings<'tcx>(
     ));
 
     mappings.extend(mcdc_decisions.iter().filter_map(
-        |&mappings::MCDCDecision { span, bitmap_idx, conditions_num, .. }| {
+        |&mappings::MCDCDecision { span, bitmap_idx, num_conditions, .. }| {
             let code_region = region_for_span(span)?;
-            let kind = MappingKind::MCDCDecision(DecisionInfo { bitmap_idx, conditions_num });
+            let kind = MappingKind::MCDCDecision(DecisionInfo { bitmap_idx, num_conditions });
             Some(Mapping { kind, code_region })
         },
     ));
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ fn inject_mcdc_statements<'tcx>(
         span: _,
         ref end_bcbs,
         bitmap_idx,
-        conditions_num: _,
+        num_conditions: _,
         decision_depth,
     } in &extracted_mappings.mcdc_decisions
     {

tests/ui/instrument-coverage/mcdc-condition-limit.bad.stderr

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-warning: Conditions number of the decision (7) exceeds limit (6). MCDC analysis will not count this expression.
+warning: Number of conditions in decision (7) exceeds limit (6). MC/DC analysis will not count this expression.
   --> $DIR/mcdc-condition-limit.rs:29:8
    |
 LL |     if a && b && c && d && e && f && g {

tests/ui/instrument-coverage/mcdc-condition-limit.rs

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ fn main() {
 fn main() {
     // 7 conditions is too many, so issue a diagnostic.
     let [a, b, c, d, e, f, g] = <[bool; 7]>::default();
-    if a && b && c && d && e && f && g { //[bad]~ WARNING Conditions number of the decision
+    if a && b && c && d && e && f && g { //[bad]~ WARNING Number of conditions in decision
         core::hint::black_box("hello");
     }
 }