-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 212
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a magic comment syntax to set MIRIFLAGS #781
Open
saethlin
wants to merge
4
commits into
rust-lang:main
Choose a base branch
from
saethlin:custom-flags
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
73f7c7c
Add a magic comment syntax to set MIRIFLAGS
saethlin e1c07ef
Don't default to diabling isolation, but demo it in docs
saethlin 605f1fe
Parse magic comment on lines after the first if they are not indented
saethlin 0e47158
Accept the comment anywhere
saethlin File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -3,5 +3,4 @@ | |
set -eu | ||
|
||
export MIRI_SYSROOT=~/.cache/miri/HOST | ||
export MIRIFLAGS="-Zmiri-disable-isolation" | ||
exec cargo miri run |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
An outer attribute seems weird, here:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
seems plausible to me. My instinct here is to err on the side of accepting as much as possible, because I think the only alternative we have is silently ignoring things.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree... whenever I use magic comments on ui tests I am nervous that they might be silently ignored.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So, the thing is that:
would fail, IIUC, since it wouldn't be the first-line of a file. And I can imagine the transition from your snippet to mine occurring quite easily, especially given that
would not be valid Rust.
I'd rather have Miri start saying with which
MIRIFLAGS
it is being run (which seems like a nice addition overall), rather than have an outer attribute be accepter where an inner one should be used: it is all too reminiscent of:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm... good point. Playground will also add
feature
lines at the very top of the snippet when you click the error message that complains about a missing feature gate.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think
#![feature(...)]
is pretty problematic here. I was afraid magic comments would run into this kind of complexity.Parsing the magic comment on lines other than the first makes some sense in response to this, but then we run into this:
I agree that Miri should report its configuration somewhere.
Other things we could do...
cargo-miri
is run. All other build options we would want as arguments tocargo rustc
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this is unreasonable. It's not like people are shipping code using the playground, and this seems to be quite an edge case (https://grep.app/search?q=//%20MIRIFLAGS and https://cs.github.com/?scopeName=All+repos&scope=&q=%22%2F%2F+MIRIFLAGS%22 say enough of one that it doesn't exist in open source rust code).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@thomcc Can you clarify what exactly "it" is here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The issue you are describing here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's fine if that turns on that MIRIFLAG