Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix cargo tests when running inside the rustlang/rust repo #5688

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 5, 2020

Conversation

ebroto
Copy link
Member

@ebroto ebroto commented Jun 5, 2020

It seems we hit rust-lang/cargo#5418, so I've applied the suggested solution. Also added some more info when cargo-metadata fails to execute.

(there was no open issue for this)

changelog: none

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @Manishearth

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Jun 5, 2020
@ebroto
Copy link
Member Author

ebroto commented Jun 5, 2020

r? @flip1995 as they are familiar with the issue

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned flip1995 and unassigned Manishearth Jun 5, 2020
@flip1995
Copy link
Member

flip1995 commented Jun 5, 2020

Thanks! I tested it in the rustc codebase and it worked!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 5, 2020

📌 Commit c325c12 has been approved by flip1995

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 5, 2020

⌛ Testing commit c325c12 with merge ea7066a...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jun 5, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: flip1995
Pushing ea7066a to master...

@bors bors merged commit ea7066a into rust-lang:master Jun 5, 2020
@ebroto ebroto deleted the fix_cargo_tests_in_rustc branch June 5, 2020 22:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants