lint against String.repeat(1)

[matthiaskrgr]

    let x = String::from("hello world").repeat(1);

or

    let x = String::from("hello");
    let y = x.repeat(1);

does just clone the String.

[einashaddad]

I'll pick this up!

[flip1995]

Great! If you have any questions, feel free to ask here or open a WIP PR. We're happy to help!

[einashaddad]

Awesome, thanks!

Here's an initial stab at it: #3060

[HarrisonMc555]

@einashaddad Are you still interested in taking care of this lint? I'm looking for an issue or two to pick up, I'd be willing to help out here if you're no longer available.

[flip1995]

I think the PR #3060 was nearly finished, except of some review comments, that need to be addressed. You could go from there.

[HarrisonMc555]

Ok, will do. Thanks!

[einashaddad]

Hey y'all - sorry for the late reply, I've been traveling. I can address the comments in a week when I'm back from vacation!

…

On Tue, Apr 23, 2019, 12:29 AM Harrison ***@***.***> wrote: Ok, will do. Thanks! — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#3028 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAUBWSKYX5WL7ZLAXZFKU7LPRXKW5ANCNFSM4FPDI4OQ> .

[giraffate]

Hi! If nobody is interested in this, could I try this?

[flip1995]

Yes, take a look at #3060, which is nearly finished

[giraffate]

@flip1995 Thank you for your infomation.

And I am sorry for the question immediately, why is String.repeat(1) bad?
I couldn't understand the hidden intention behind the repeat(1) call in this comment well.

[flip1995]

Oh String.repeat(1) is the same as String.clone(). See the documentation:

Creates a new String by repeating a string n times.

with n=1 this is the same as cloning the string. If that is really the intention behind this, clone should be used.