-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 700
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Struct containing a pointer to multi-dimensional array that has one zero sized dimension. #1153
Labels
Comments
Expected ResultsWe generate types with the expected size and alignment ;) Thanks for the bug report! |
It seems like the input header in the issue isn't complete -- what is |
Doh I totally misread -- that's the name of a field. |
I think we may need to differentiate between zero-sized and incomplete arrays to fix this. That's probably overdue either way. |
bors-servo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 30, 2017
Property testing with quickcheck This PR represents an attempt to address issue #970. It also represents a portion of the meta issue for fuzzing #972. The code base reflected here uses quickcheck to generate C headers that include a variety of types including basic types, structs, unions, function prototypes and function pointers. The headers generated by quickcheck are passed to the `csmith-fuzzing/predicate.py` script. Examples of headers generated by this iteration of the tooling can be viewed [here](https://gist.github.com/snewt/03ce934f35c5b085807d2d5cf11d1d5c). At the top of each header are two simple struct definitions, `whitelistable` and `blacklistable`. Those types are present in the vector that represents otherwise primitive types used to generate. They represent a naive approach to exposing custom types without having to intuit generated type names like `struct_21_8` though _any actual whitelisting logic isn't implemented here_. Test success is measured by the success of the `csmith-fuzzing/predicate.py` script. This means that for a test to pass the following must be true: - bindgen doesn't panic - the resulting bindings compile - the resulting bindings layout tests pass #### Usage ```bash cd tests/property_test cargo test ``` Some things I'm unsure of: #### Where should this feature live? At the moment it lives in `tests/property_test` but isn't run when `cargo test` is invoked from bindgen's cargo manifest directory. #### What's an acceptable ammount of time for these tests to take? At this point, the source is genereated in ~1 second but the files are large enough that it takes the `predicate.py` script ~30 seconds to run through each one. In order for the tests to run in under a minute only 2 are generated by quickcheck by default. This can be changed in the `test_bindgen` function of the `tests/property_test/tests/fuzzed-c-headers.rs` file. #### How do we expose the generated code for easy inspection? For now the `run_predicate_script` function in the `tests/property_test/tests/fuzzed-c-headers.rs` file contains a commented block that will copy generated source in the `tests/property_test/tests` directory. Should it be easier? #### Special casing There is some logic in the fuzzer that disallows 0 sized arrays because tests will regulary fail due to issues documented in #684 and #1153. Should this be special casing? #### Does the fuzzer warrant its own crate? After any iterations the reviewers are interested in required to make this a functional testing tool, should/could the fuzzing library be made into its own crate? I didn't move in that direction yet because having it all in one place seemed like the best way to figure out what works an doesn't but I'm interested in whether it might be useful as a standalone library. #### What does it look like to expose more useful functionality? I'm looking forward to feedback on how to make this a more useful tool and one that provides the right configurability. Thanks! r? @fitzgen
bors-servo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 9, 2017
Enable Cargo features for quickchecking crate Logic to enable/disable special casing (due to known issues #550, #684, and #1153) has been exposed as features in the `quickchecking` crate's Cargo.toml file and corresponding `cfg` attributes in the source. In addition to adding Cargo features, this PR represents the following: - Documentation in `bindgen`'s CONTRIBUTING.md that points to a new README.md located in the `quickchecking` crate's directory. - The Debug trait was implemented for the `HeaderC` type. This enables failing property tests to be reported as C source code rather than a Rust data structure. - The ArrayDimensionC type is now used in header generation for union, struct, and basic declarations. Thanks for taking a look and for any feedback! Closes #1169 r? @fitzgen
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello,
I'm working on generating some valid C headers as property tests for bindgen, issue #970.
While filling in the generation logic I'm starting to come across code that makes
the
csmith-fuzzing/predicate.py
script cough. I don't know how many of these theremight be (or how many might be false alarms like #1151) so I'm open to just keeping a
public running list somewhere if raising issues as I encounter them isn't the preference.
I'm also open to sharing some of the generated
bonkers preliminary code
that bindgen is handling happily.
This also seems related to issue #684 which the property tests have run into as well.
This one only fails the
csmith-fuzzing/predicate.py
script though,rustc
seems to compile without errors so I thought I'd bring it up.Sorry if the code looks insane, it's generated! 😰
Here's the result of
rustup show
:Input C/C++ Header
Bindgen Invocation
I've been using the
csmith-fuzzing/predicate.py
script to test so the failing invocation would look like this assuming that definition is in a header namedprop_test.h
Actual Results
Script output:
rustc
output when given the generated code:Generated code:
Expected Results
🙃 I'm not quite fluent enough in bindgen output to answer this one.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: