Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

redox: support crt-static #1322

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 19, 2019
Merged

redox: support crt-static #1322

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 19, 2019

Conversation

jackpot51
Copy link
Contributor

This reuses the code from musl to add support to Redox for crt-static.

Linking to m is also unnecessary as it is included in c

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @gnzlbg

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@gnzlbg
Copy link
Contributor

gnzlbg commented Apr 19, 2019

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 19, 2019

📌 Commit 319b7b5 has been approved by gnzlbg

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 19, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 319b7b5 with merge a79c2d4...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2019
redox: support crt-static

This reuses the code from musl to add support to Redox for crt-static.

Linking to `m` is also unnecessary as it is included in `c`
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 19, 2019

☀️ Test successful - checks-cirrus, checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: gnzlbg
Pushing a79c2d4 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 319b7b5 into rust-lang:master Apr 19, 2019
@jackpot51 jackpot51 mentioned this pull request Apr 19, 2019
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2019
Bump to 0.2.52

This will allow the crt-static feature to be utilized correctly on Redox, #1322
@gnzlbg gnzlbg mentioned this pull request May 2, 2019
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants