-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 603
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement GET /crates/:crate_id/maintenance.svg
endpoint
#2439
Conversation
r? @sgrif (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
1725932
to
dcbe681
Compare
dcbe681
to
9423034
Compare
r? @smarnach |
9423034
to
10941b9
Compare
@smarnach any thoughts on this? :) |
Remove some badges documentation. Badges have been removed from crates.io, so this updates the documentation. I don't think Cargo should manage a schema for the different services, and since crates.io isn't using these, I think it is mostly a dead feature. I left the `maintenance` field, because that might still have some meaning in the future. More details: * Removal from crates.io: rust-lang/crates.io#2436 rust-lang/crates.io#2440 * Solicited feedback for this change: https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/cargo-badges/12982 * Potential future support of `maintenance` status: rust-lang/crates.io#2437 rust-lang/crates.io#2438 rust-lang/crates.io#2439. It's not clear, if crates.io manages the status in the database, the motivation for putting it in `Cargo.toml` is probably pretty small.
reminder for myself: the weekly meeting decided to serve the SVGs ourselves instead of forwarding to shields.io |
282d7f7
to
f771584
Compare
f771584
to
99f0298
Compare
99f0298
to
1fe81c3
Compare
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #2993) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. Note that reviewers usually do not review pull requests until merge conflicts are resolved! Once you resolve the conflicts, you should change the labels applied by bors to indicate that your PR is ready for review. Post this as a comment to change the labels:
|
Resolves #2438
This will have to be revisited though when #2437 is being implemented.