-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: centralize git checkouts and db paths #13187
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How appropriate is it to
join
on aFilesystem
and pass that around?From what little I've interacted with
Filesystem
, it seems like its meant to be the root for (e.g. its whats lockable) which makes it feel strange to creatingFilesystem
s for directories we don't lock (instead we lock the parent)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see it like “hey this path might be locked so be careful when manipulate stuff under the path.”
registry_index_path
is constructed in the same way, though this doesn't justify it is correct.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yea, the idea is to only interact with the filesystem using
Filesystem
, and never use rawPath
. That helps ensure you only access files with appropriate locking. Unfortunately we're not very good with that. Wheneverinto_path_unlocked
is used, that indicates the abstraction is leaking. It is necessary in many cases, since other libraries (like libgit2) won't take aFilesystem
, but I thinkinto_path_unlocked
is used a little too often. There are also many places that don't use Filesystem. For example,Layout
has its own locking mechanism, and thus doesn't need it.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Which lock is being held for git checkouts and git dbs?
If its not the individual db's and checkouts, then this seems like the wrong API in the first place as we are saying "this is lockable" when, in reality, locking it would be the wrong decision. One idea for improving this (if that is the case) is to "lock project" and allow
Filesystem.join
to carry-forward the path to the lockable resource.