Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-tighten up some verbiage #1437

Merged

Conversation

traviscross
Copy link
Contributor

@traviscross traviscross commented Nov 29, 2024

We had said "further upon X". We really meant "further X". This was changed to "further improve upon X" instead in PR #1436, but that's a bit odd as the sentence uses "improvements" directly before it.

Let's tighten this up to just say "further X".

Rendered

cc @Kobzol

@traviscross traviscross force-pushed the TC/retighten-verbiage-in-rust-2024-nightly-beta-announcement branch from ebe13c7 to 2b151b3 Compare November 29, 2024 23:10
We had said "further upon X".  We really meant "further X".  This was
changed in a recent PR to "further improve upon X" instead, but that's
a bit odd as the sentence uses "improvements" directly before it.

Let's tighten this up to just say "further X".
@traviscross traviscross force-pushed the TC/retighten-verbiage-in-rust-2024-nightly-beta-announcement branch from 2b151b3 to 6615243 Compare November 29, 2024 23:11
Copy link
Contributor

@ehuss ehuss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@ehuss ehuss merged commit ff77580 into master Nov 30, 2024
3 checks passed
@ehuss ehuss deleted the TC/retighten-verbiage-in-rust-2024-nightly-beta-announcement branch November 30, 2024 00:36
@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Nov 30, 2024

Oh, I had no idea that "further" can be used as a verb. The fix looked obvious, but I should have asked, sorry.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants