Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add rustc_hashes #8

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Add rustc_hashes #8

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

lnicola
Copy link
Member

@lnicola lnicola commented Feb 24, 2025

No description provided.

RustcApCrate {
name: "rustc_hashes".to_owned(),
dir: "compiler/rustc_hashes".to_owned(),
in_tree_feature_name: "".to_owned(),
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r? @Veykril not sure if this works

@Veykril
Copy link
Member

Veykril commented Feb 24, 2025

That shouldn't be necessary, it's already published due to being a dependency https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rustc-auto-publish/actions/runs/13436467640/job/37539799087

found packages: ["rustc_index", "rustc_index_macros", "rustc_pattern_analysis", "rustc_parse_format", "rustc_lexer", "rustc_abi", "rustc_hashes"]
topologically sorted: ["rustc_index_macros", "rustc_index", "rustc_pattern_analysis", "rustc_lexer", "rustc_parse_format", "rustc_hashes", "rustc_abi"]

(had to manually run it so i could swap the token for new publish permissions)

@lnicola
Copy link
Member Author

lnicola commented Feb 24, 2025

Ah, okay, it's there https://crates.io/crates/ra-ap-rustc_hashes 🤦.

@lnicola lnicola closed this Feb 24, 2025
@lnicola lnicola deleted the rustc-hashes branch February 24, 2025 08:08
@Veykril
Copy link
Member

Veykril commented Feb 24, 2025

We'd need to add it if it had a nightly feature to strip though

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants