Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: add custom bucket for throttling metric #5461

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 29, 2025

Conversation

mihir20
Copy link
Contributor

@mihir20 mihir20 commented Jan 29, 2025

Description

add custom bucket for throttling metric

Linear Ticket

Security

  • The code changed/added as part of this pull request won't create any security issues with how the software is being used.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.77%. Comparing base (66139a2) to head (3d6d438).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5461      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   74.79%   74.77%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         440      440              
  Lines       61490    61507      +17     
==========================================
+ Hits        45991    45994       +3     
- Misses      12962    12970       +8     
- Partials     2537     2543       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

runner/buckets.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@fracasula fracasula enabled auto-merge (squash) January 29, 2025 15:20
@fracasula fracasula merged commit e472c28 into master Jan 29, 2025
56 checks passed
@fracasula fracasula deleted the mihir/add-throttling-buckets branch January 29, 2025 15:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants