adds CREDITS, plus mocha tests for transpiled node

.gitignore

@@ -1 +1,3 @@
 node_modules/
+package-lock.json
+lib/netmask.js

CREDITS.md

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+Credits
+=======
+
+These credits refer to the contributors to this repository:
+
+[@rs](https://github.com/rs) - maintainer
+
+[@ryanrolds](https://github.com/ryanrolds) - Now with 0.4.x support. #2
+
+[@palmerabollo](https://github.com/palmerabollo) - Expressions "1.2.3.4/" are not valid #6
+
+[@steve-jansen](https://github.com/steve-jansen) - fixes typo in readme.md #7
+
+[@jksdua](https://github.com/jksdua) - Added forEach helper to allow looping through usable IP addresses #9
+
+[@gmiroshnykov](https://github.com/gmiroshnykov) - Tiny typo fix #10
+
+[@TooTallNate](https://github.com/TooTallNate) - package: move "coffee-script" to devDependencies #11, README: fix small typo #12
+
+[@yorkie](https://github.com/yorkie) - more rigid check for Netmask.constructor #13
+
+[@runk](https://github.com/runk) - fix contains method for netmasks #18
+
+[@yvesago](https://github.com/yvesago) - a patch with mocha test to fix /31 and /32 block.contains #20
+
+[@meteormatt](https://github.com/meteormatt) - The comment in README.md is wrong #22
+
+[@dschenkelman](https://github.com/dschenkelman) - Avoid large memory allocations when doing forEach in case netmask is large (e.g. /8) #34
+
+[@sickcodes](https://github.com/sickcodes), [@kaoudis](https://github.com/kaoudis), [@Koroeskohr](https://github.com/Koroeskohr), [@nicksahler](https://github.com/nicksahler) - harden error handling, add a few more tests, and include CREDITS.md #36

README.md

@@ -60,6 +60,11 @@ Installation
 
     $ npm install netmask
 
+Run all tests (vows plus mocha)
+-------------------------------
+
+    $ npm test
+
 License
 -------
 

package.json

@@ -23,13 +23,14 @@
     "main": "./lib/netmask",
     "scripts": {
         "prepublish": "coffee -c lib/*.coffee",
-        "test": "vows --spec test/*"
+        "test": "coffee -c lib/*.coffee && vows --spec test/* && mocha tests/*"
     },
     "engines": {
         "node": ">= 0.4.0"
     },
     "devDependencies": {
         "coffee-script": ">=1.2.0",
+        "mocha": "^8.3.2",
         "vows": "*"
     }
 }

tests/netmask.js

@@ -1,24 +1,103 @@
-/* some troubles with vows
-   here is some mocha test
-
- npm install  
- mocha tests/netmask.js
-*/
-var assert = require('assert');
-
-var Netmask = require('../').Netmask;
-
-var block = new Netmask('10.1.2.0/24');
-var b1 = new Netmask('10.1.2.10/29');
-var b2 = new Netmask('10.1.2.10/31');
-var b3 = new Netmask('10.1.2.20/32');
-
- console.log('first : '+b2.base);
- console.log('broadcast : '+b2.broadcast);
- console.log('last : ' + b2.last);
-
-describe("Netmask contains bug", function() {
-  assert.equal(block.contains(b1),true);
-  assert.equal(block.contains(b2),true);
-  assert.equal(block.contains(b3),true);
-});
+/* It is important to test our Javascript output as well as our coffeescript, 
+ * since code that is transpiled may be slightly different in effect from the
+ * original.
+ * 
+ * Run these tests (against lib/netmask.js, not lib/netmask.coffee directly)
+ * using mocha, after re-generating lib/netmask.js including your changes:
+ *
+ * mocha tests/netmask.js
+ */
+
+const assert = require('assert');
+const Netmask = require('../').Netmask;
+
+describe('Netmask', () => {
+  describe('can build a block', () => {
+    let block = new Netmask('10.1.2.0/24');
+
+    it('should contain a sub-block', () => {
+      let block1 = new Netmask('10.1.2.10/29');
+      assert(block.contains(block1));
+    });
+
+    it('should contain another sub-block', () => {
+      let block2 = new Netmask('10.1.2.10/31');
+      assert(block.contains(block2));
+    });
+
+    it('should contain a third sub-block', () => {
+      let block3 = new Netmask('10.1.2.20/32');
+      assert(block.contains(block3));
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('when presented with an octet which is not a number', () => {
+    let block = new Netmask('192.168.0.0/29')
+
+    it('should throw', () => {
+      assert.throws(() => block.contains('192.168.~.4'), Error);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('can handle hexadecimal, octal, & decimal octets in input IP', () => {
+    let block1 = new Netmask('31.0.0.0/19');
+    let block2 = new Netmask('127.0.0.0/8');
+    let block3 = new Netmask('255.0.0.1/12');
+    let block4 = new Netmask('10.0.0.1/8');
+    let block5 = new Netmask('1.0.0.1/4');
+
+    describe('octal', () => {
+      it('block 31.0.0.0/19 does not contain 031.0.5.5', () => {
+        assert(!block1.contains('031.0.5.5'));
+      }); 
+      it('block 127.0.0.0/8 contains 0177.0.0.2 (127.0.0.2)', () => {
+        assert(block2.contains('0177.0.0.2'));
+      });
+      it('block 255.0.0.1/12 does not contain 0255.0.0.2 (173.0.0.2)', () => {
+        assert(!block3.contains('0255.0.0.2'));
+      });
+      it('block 10.0.0.1/8 contains 012.0.0.255 (10.0.0.255)', () => {
+        assert(block4.contains('012.0.0.255'));
+      });
+      it('block 1.0.0.1/4 contains 01.02.03.04', () => {
+        assert(block5.contains('01.02.03.04'));
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('hexadecimal', () => {
+      it('block 31.0.0.0/19 does not contain 0x31.0.5.5', () => {
+        assert(!block1.contains('0x31.0.5.5'));
+      });
+      it('block 127.0.0.0/8 contains 0x7f.0.0.0x2 (127.0.0.2)', () => {
+        assert(block2.contains('0x7f.0.0.0x2'));
+      });
+      it('block 255.0.0.1/12 contains 0xff.0.0.2', () => {
+        assert(block3.contains('0xff.0.0.2'));
+      });
+      it('block 10.0.0.1/8 does not contain 0x10.0.0.255', () => {
+        assert(!block4.contains('0x10.0.0.255'));
+      });
+      it('block 1.0.0.1/4 contains 0x1.0x2.0x3.0x4', () => {
+        assert(block5.contains('0x1.0x2.0x3.0x4'));
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('decimal', () => {
+      it('block 31.0.0.0/19 contains 31.0.5.5', () => {
+        assert(block1.contains('31.0.5.5'));
+      });
+      it('block 127.0.0.0/8 does not contain 128.0.0.2', () =>{
+        assert(!block2.contains('128.0.0.2'));
+      });
+      it('block 255.0.0.1/12 contains 255.0.0.2', () => {
+        assert(block3.contains('255.0.0.2'));
+      });
+      it('block 10.0.0.1/8 contains 10.0.0.255', () => {
+        assert(block4.contains('10.0.0.255'));
+      });
+      it('block 1.0.0.1/4 contains 1.2.3.4', () => {
+        assert(block5.contains('1.2.3.4'));
+      });
+    });
+  });
+});