-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Deconflict PR 632 with FATES master (commit 8abef14) #2
Deconflict PR 632 with FATES master (commit 8abef14) #2
Conversation
…routine calculating conductance. Need to revisit stem path lengths and use the Savage fractal stuff.
…ydraulicsMod, used FatesPlantHydraulics HEAD to resolve manually.
…ns not summing to unity.
…nd have primitive arguments, to allow simpler unit testing.
…in hydro routine to use new functions.
…edotransfer functions to handle unconstrained regimes.
Move all the patch-level hist vars to site-level
Fixes to initialization order and circular dependencies
Change license field in zenodo to BSD-3-Clause
Add Zenodo DOI badge to README
…g trampled in merge deconflict
Test in progress:
UPDATE: 4x5 grid case ran to completion. |
@rosiealice when I was deconflicting this branch I noticed that this code seems to be unused: fates/biogeochem/EDPhysiologyMod.F90 Line 1201 in 347270b
It looks like it was added here during this commit: 05ac748, but then removed at this commit: e39ad3f. Was it alright that I left out the |
update my fork with original
Dynamic roots md bugfix rkupdates
merge root density disagregation
Adding the fates_rad_model to the parameter file
Update to `sci.1.57.2_api.23.0.0` and add distance utilities
memory and restart updates to TRS
Small quality of life update to cohort age in create_cohort
Merging this as the code is now running and calculating emissions.
migrating unit testing to folder unit_testing
Description:
This PR pre-merges FATES master to resolve the merge conflicts in PR NGEET#632. This is mostly due to the creation of FatesInterfaceTypesMod.F90 during PR NGEET#647.
Note there are also two small updates that were missed in PR 647. Some dead code was removed and
set_bcs
was made public (see also NGEET#648).Collaborators: @rgknox
Expectation of Answer Changes:
This should not changes answers relative to the original PR test results.
Checklist:
Test Results:
TBD
CTSM (or) E3SM (specify which) test hash-tag:
CTSM (or) E3SM (specify which) baseline hash-tag:
FATES baseline hash-tag:
Test Output: